Well the opening was a mess and after that it was 'unclear' as they used to say when things were too complicated to analyse. Anyway, you navigated the complications better than your opponent.
My least accurate game in a long time, but why?
Sort:
I just played this 15|10 game, and as with all of my 15|10 games I used the computer analysis as a quick blunder-check. It came back with two very low "Accuracy" numbers--25% for me and 15% for my opponent (for reference, normally I see "Accuracy" scores of 75-85% at this rating level)--but when I looked through the moves that it considered to be mistakes, blunders, or missed wins, many of them weren't really the type of simple tactics I can easily spot and understand the "human rationale" behind why something would be a winning or losing move.
That's why I'm coming here for human help--I would like to discuss why some of my moves--and my opponent's moves--were bad from a "human" perspective, in the cases where they didn't fall into 1-to-3-move tactics. For now, I'm just posting the game; I can come back and annotate certain moves later as I have time.