My opponent got so lucky!

Sort:
Reepicheep14

My opponent got so lucky to get a draw in this game. I was clearly winning; I was up +6 at the end, but the site said it was a draw from insufficient material.

notmtwain

If you want to win based on points, play backgammon.

Junebug444

This analyzer is obviously biased. Visit this link for a more neutral analysis of the game

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/my-best-game-ever-1?newCommentCount=4#first_new_comment 

Reepicheep14

LOL, my opponent isn't biased?

Tetra_Wolf
Reepicheep14 wrote:

My opponent got so lucky to get a draw in this game. I was clearly winning; I was up +6 at the end, but the site said it was a draw from insufficient material.

 

Hi troll. Where's a moderator?

Tetra_Wolf

This game

1) NEVER HAPPENED

Tetra_Wolf

What kind of abuse is this? I want to know how to report this troll

Tetra_Wolf

Fine this game might have happened but your opponent was winning the whole game

DetectiveRams

 Black's king was a coward. A smart one though. White's king and all his pieces were idiots. I think your dumb play inflicted black's pieces with permanent brain damaged that caused them to play like that. Really i think we need a more neutral analysis. Actually, throughout almost the whole game, the computer said black was winning. If black was up even though it's pieces had brain damage, what do you make of white's pieces?

DetectiveRams
apotosaurus wrote:
Reepicheep14 wrote:

My opponent got so lucky to get a draw in this game. I was clearly winning; I was up +6 at the end, but the site said it was a draw from insufficient material.

 

Hi troll. Where's a moderator?

Get a sense of humour man. Some people enjoy this kinda stuff. It makes them feel better after rigorously following fundamental chess techniques and playing a lot of serious games. You have a right to not find this funny, but expressing anger or distaste at it? That is just downright weird and despicable. 

Junebug444
apotosaurus wrote:

Fine this game might have happened but your opponent was winning the whole game

Ahah! An intelligent chess player has entered the scenes!

MaxTrimmer
apotosaurus wrote:

This game

1) NEVER HAPPENED

It was staged like a WWE match.

Reepicheep14
apotosaurus wrote:

This game

1) NEVER HAPPENED

https://www.chess.com/daily/game/187976212

Reepicheep14
USERNAMEmystery220 wrote:
apotosaurus wrote:

This game

1) NEVER HAPPENED

It was staged like a WWE match.

Staged?  Junebug, did I tell you which moves to play?  You certainly didn't tell me what to play.  I simply out-played you and you got lucky.

Junebug444

Ha. Even the computer knows i was better throughout the entire game.

Reepicheep14

The computer simply can't understand the lines we were playing, and misevaluates the value of a touchdown.

Junebug444

A computer can calculate close to anything, and almost never misevaluates. I'm sure the value of a touchdown was programmed into stockfish, yet it still suggests I'm better.

irishfan80

The narrative is quite good.

Reepicheep14

I looked at the stockfish code.  It doesn't even consider touchdowns.

Junebug444

50% of stockfish's code is written on a hidden template that we do not have access to.