instead of 16 Ng6, how about 16 Nd3. how does Black guard his Be6 ?
On .... Kd7, then 17 Nc5+, Qxc5 18 Qxe6+, Kd8 19 Bd4 and Q must stay on diagonal with Rook on f8, ie;...... Qb4 20 Bxg7 with big attack
16 ..... Kf7 is much worse as 17 Nc5, Qxc5 18 Qxe6 #
A few days ago, I played a game that I was practically ashamed of. I felt that both me and my opponent deserved to lose that game, but I managed to blunder a little more than my opponent and then lose on time in a 30|0 game. I took a break from chess but then hit the analysis board hard, trying to learn everything I could. I wrote a paragraph or more for every single move, explaining why and how it is was inferior to the winning move, and made puzzles for future study. It was embarrassing to watch the engine go back and forth between +5 and -5 in a 1400 game. Unbelievable.
So far I have only posted losses for analysis, but I think this win requires a lot of analysis. I think almost no move I played was actually the number 1 engine move, and I would like to see the correct opponent defenses for what I did play.
So when I say "one of the best" I mean "most memorable" or "most fun". I haven't checked with an engine yet to see if it is objectively good chess.
Perhaps you might understand now why I would make an exception and post a game where I won for analysis. In this sort of playstyle, there is almost always a lot of room for improvement, and it's been tough for me to learn how to attack romantically with only numbers and moves from my engine. I would like human feedback on how to find the best moves in open positions like this.