Paul Morphy V.S Conway

Sort:
Alander97


demuxer
dang!!  this Morphy crazy!!!   Ididnt see that game ,  thanks a lot for sharing!! I wonder if you can make it to another player
AlphenScot
Morphy was the dogs bollocks.Attack,attack with no interest in defence.An overwhelming opponent.Personally I rate him the best ever.As Bobby Fischer said "with modern chess techniques Morphy would beat everybody on the planet".And Fischer knew far,far more about chess than most people!!!
Jaguarphd
Morphy is up there with fischer in my book :)
Escapest_Pawn
As I said in your Carpentier game, I love these Morphy-amateur games.  They are all instructive and make me wonder how much I overlook over-the-board.  When I was twenty, (1970) before I was aware of opening books, I naively believed I had invented the Muzio.  When I first read about it, it had been analyzed to a draw.  Then (in the 80s, I think) it was re-invented, avoiding the drawn line.  I am glad to see that Morphy employed it.  Are there other examples of his using it?
Escapest_Pawn

It should be noted that all the mates after 10)Qxf4 are obvious except if 10...Kg6 then:

11)Qf6+ Kh5

12)g4+ Kxg4 forced

13)Rf4+ and mate next move with white's rook or queen moving to h4 according to black's move.


batgirl

One thing that distinguished Morphy from his contemporaries was his defense.  

 

"Conway" in the above game in the Rev. M. D. Conway.. As you may note in his writing below, the game should have Morphy playing at Rook-odds.

 

Conway wrote of his encounter with PAul Morphy in his autobiography  (Memories and Experiences of Moncure Daniel Conway, 1904. pp 257-8) :

"Despite all my freedom there was a curious survival in me up to my twenty-seventh year of the Methodist dread of card-playing.  The only indoor game I knew was chess.  There was a flourishing Chess Club in Cincinnati and I entered into matches with keen interest.  For a time I edited a weekly chess column in the Cincinnati Commercial and wrote an article on chess which Lowell published in the Atlantic Monthly.  Whenever in New York I hastened to the Chess Club there,  and watched the play of Lichtenhein,  Thompson, Perrin,  Marache,  Fiske  (editor of the Chess Monthly),  and Col. Mead,  president of the club.  This was at the time when the wonderful Paul Morphy was exciting the world.  In July, 1959,  I called on him at the Brevoort House,  New York.  He was a rather small man with a beardless face that would have been boyish had it not been for the melancholy eyes.

He was gentlemanly and spoke in low tones.   It had long been out of the question to play with him on even terms;  the first-class players generally received the advantage of a knight,  but being a second-class player,  I was given a rook.  In some letter written at the time,  I find mention of five games I was beaten with these odds, but managed  (or was permitted)  to draw the sixth.   In the same letter I find the following -

"When one plays with Morphy,  the sensation is a queer as the first electric shock, or the first love, or chloroform, or any entirely novel experience.  As you sit down at the board opposite him,  a certain sheepishness steals over you, ad you cannot rid yourself on an old fable in which a lion's skin plays a large part.  Then you are sure you must have the advantage.  You seem to be secure,  -  you get a rook  -  you are ahead two pieces!  three!! 

Gently,  as if wafted by a zephyr,  the pieces glide around the board,  and presently as you are about to win the game,  a soft voice it  your ear kindly insinuates,  Mate!  You are speechless.  Again and again you try,  again and again you are sure you must win;  again and again your prodigal antagonist leaves his pieces at your mercy,  but his moves are as the steps of Fate.  Then you are charmed all along  -  so bewitchingly are you beheaded one had rather be run through by Bayard,  you know,  than spared by a pretender.  On the whole I could only remember the oriental anecdote of one who was taken to the banks of the Euphrates,  where by a princely host he was led about the beautiful gardens and bowers,  then asked if anything could be more beautiful,.  "Yes, "he replied,  "the chess-playing of El-Zuli."  So having lately sailed,  I told you,  down the Hudson,  having explored Staten Island,  Hoboken,  Fort Hamilton and all the glorious retreats about New York,  I shall say one thing is more beautiful than them all,  -  the chess-play of Paul Morphy."

This was in July, 1959.  I had already received the domestic instruction that it was possible to give too much time to an innocent game, and the hint was reinforced by my experience with Morphy.  I concluded that,  if,  after all the time I had given to chess,  any man could give me a rook and beat me easily,  any ambition in that area might as well be denounced.  Thenceforth I played only on vacations or when at sea."

 

Other Morphy Muzios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Escapest_Pawn

Thank you Bat Girl and I really appreciate info, the poetic prose (1959?? twice), and the fascinating games. I admire your knowledge and computer savvy.

If you were responding to my request for Morphy muzios, I owe you. 


batgirl

 

       "the poetic prose (1959?? twice)"

Yeah, we're all subject to that -

       "all the mates after 10)Qxf4 are obvious expect if 10...Kg6 then:"

 

The Muzios were for your benefit in answer to your speculation.  I think those are about all of Morphy's recorded Muzio Gambits. 

 

P.S.  I'm about the least computer savvy person you're likely to ever meet.

 


batgirl

You can download a pgn off all known Morphy games at my site: http://sbchess.sinfree.net/MyMorphyMB.html 

 

Contrary to anything you might read elsewhere, there are 472 recorded Morphy games.  In this file each game is sourced and annotated with pertinent historical data.

 

You can also go to the Morphy page at Chessgames.com,  but it doesn't contain all of Morphy's games.  However, you can read some rather long discussions on Morphy,  or contribute your own.