16211 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
As I've said before, in an effort to improve my understanding of chess, I've decided to post a few of my games here for community analysis. This game is a little lazy on my part, since my opening strategy was dubious. However, inaccurate play by my opponent eventually led to victory for me. Please help me :)
looks pretty solid to me
Rather than 27. Rxa6 (letting his Bishop out), I would have preferred Rd1 intending Rdd7. Then centralize your King.
Black has played such inaccuracy on opening such as the move ...c6 which blocks the scope of bishop and also does ignore the principle of development on opening. It played ...d6, ...c6, ...e6 too many pawn moves that the most logical continuation is to castle, put rooks on center, and later attack the center.
White's material advantage does converted in to win.
You should not exchange off queens when you have a space (and central)
advantage. You should be attacking.
Yes, attacker side must ignore exchange because the attack will reduce it's efficiency and sometimes can fail
That makes sense. Thanks for the advice.
Thanks for the advice.
There are several important exceptions to that "Don't exchange while attacking" rule...
If you are up in material, exchanging pieces might lead to a more certain win than continuing your attack.
If most of the opponent's defensive resources rely on one specific piece (eg: his Queen), then an exchange might suddenly leave him helpless against the remaining attackers.
Thanks. I suppose I should judge whether or not the position calls for it. Thanks guys for all the help so far!
Your opponent is a beginner I think.... this game looks really full of mistakes especially with your opponent...
" The Call of the Wild with IM Danny Rensch!"
by juffure 4 minutes ago
double-knight sac, bishop-sac, queen-sac, king-sac???
by 1NaturalDisaster 4 minutes ago
why engine in suggesting h4 on move 6?
by Fiveofswords 5 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Missing The Obvious
by HollowHorn 12 minutes ago
This $3.00 endgame book is better than Fundamental Chess ENdings
by SilentKnighte5 23 minutes ago
Regular chess game against the computer
by petterig 23 minutes ago
Did "Rapid Chess Improvement" by Michael de la Maza work for you?
by SilentKnighte5 25 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Neumann-Hernandez Dresden 1969
by Ledgermayne1234 27 minutes ago
Who will win Candidates 2016
by Rational_Optimist 39 minutes ago
Interactive/comparative historical charts of top Fide players
by TurboFish 39 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!