post brilliant moves here note that i need proof of it being brilliant here's one to start it

I don't know why this is considered brilliant, this is just the classic old discovered attack tactic! Must be because of your elo!
Exactly.
On the other hand, did the guy notice that the a8 rook is attacked by the move? Or that the e7 knight is hanging? Probably "no" to both, which makes the "brilliant" label even funnier.

I actually don't quite get why this one is brilliant according to the analysis, but maybe you guys do? I see that the knight attacks the king, the bishop and the pawn but that can't be possibly it... Or maybe it can at my elo

I actually don't quite get why this one is brilliant according to the analysis, but maybe you guys do? I see that the knight attacks the king, the bishop and the pawn but that can't be possibly it... Or maybe it can at my elo
It’s brilliant because it’s a sacrifice!
The sacrifices I encounter at my elo are usually marked by the double question mark!

I actually don't quite get why this one is brilliant according to the analysis, but maybe you guys do? I see that the knight attacks the king, the bishop and the pawn but that can't be possibly it... Or maybe it can at my elo
its brillant because white cant take it with the bishop otherwise he loses his queen

I actually don't quite get why this one is brilliant according to the analysis, but maybe you guys do? I see that the knight attacks the king, the bishop and the pawn but that can't be possibly it... Or maybe it can at my elo
its brillant because white cant take it with the bishop otherwise he loses his queen
Why didn't you let the guy just figure it by himself? He could've learned something and that would've helped him stop being a 200!
That was really cold of you just now...
That said, thank you, pawns4ever3333.
I mean, I knew he couldn't really pull out the bishop to kill the horsey, but I didn't think this makes a brilliant move. Oh well, I guess it's brilliant just because I'm theoretically sacrificing it to a bishop. Since he can't capture, it means he probably has to mess up positioning for his other pieces...

I actually don't quite get why this one is brilliant according to the analysis, but maybe you guys do? I see that the knight attacks the king, the bishop and the pawn but that can't be possibly it... Or maybe it can at my elo
its brillant because white cant take it with the bishop otherwise he loses his queen
Why didn't you let the guy just figure it by himself? He could've learned something and that would've helped him stop being a 200!
That was really cold of you just now...
That said, thank you, pawns4ever3333.
I mean, I knew he couldn't really pull out the bishop to kill the horsey, but I didn't think this makes a brilliant move. Oh well, I guess it's brilliant just because I'm theoretically sacrificing it to a bishop. Since he can't capture, it means he probably has to mess up positioning for his other pieces...
no it actually is forking a king a bishop and a pawn, that means that u will win a bishop

I actually don't quite get why this one is brilliant according to the analysis, but maybe you guys do? I see that the knight attacks the king, the bishop and the pawn but that can't be possibly it... Or maybe it can at my elo
its brillant because white cant take it with the bishop otherwise he loses his queen
Why didn't you let the guy just figure it by himself? He could've learned something and that would've helped him stop being a 200!
That was really cold of you just now...
That said, thank you, pawns4ever3333.
I mean, I knew he couldn't really pull out the bishop to kill the horsey, but I didn't think this makes a brilliant move. Oh well, I guess it's brilliant just because I'm theoretically sacrificing it to a bishop. Since he can't capture, it means he probably has to mess up positioning for his other pieces...
no it actually is forking a king a bishop and a pawn, that means that u will win a bishop
Yeah, I mentioned that earlier as well, and I did take the bishop in the game.