20282 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hey :) This is my first post to the forums, with a game that strongly illustrates the value of a central Knight outpost and Kingside aggression thereafter. I want as much constructive criticism as possible on my thought process and moves, as far as ratings, I'm usually 1700 ish, just in a bad patch, ECF 143. Hope you enjoy it!
Black should try 29... Bxg5 30 g7 Rhg8.
But what about White? Any indications of faulty thought or weak play?
You're using too many ??'s when you annotate (those connote gross blunders only).
I'm asking about my play and thought processes, would you please be more constructive?
That is plenty constructive, assuming that you are willing to make use of it. Please stop being so constrictive.
What is constrictive in asking for constructive criticism of my moves? If you have a problem would you please come out with it? I'm gonna leave this thread for a couple of days to see if I get any more replies.
Knowing how to annotate properly is all part of your presentation. It is you who seem to have the problem.
I was having trouble playing against the Steinitz defense, so your commentary was very instructive, thank you.
Just 2 things:
1) I would have played 11.Bg5 instead of 11.Be3, to exchange off Black's knight. Then your knight on d5 would completely dominate Black's bishop, and the position would be strategically winning.
2) There is a lot of flashy stuff from move 27 onwards, lots of zwischenzugs, and you leave black's knight hanging for a while. When you're winning, try to win as simply as possible. It is the losing side that wants to complicate, the winning side wants to simplify. I've blown lots of winning positions by being tempted to enter complications.
Can women be as good at chess?
by Gamer710 a few minutes ago
Ducky is back!
by Bilbo21 a few minutes ago
To fold, or not to fold?
by Ronbo710 2 minutes ago
5/27/2016 - Straight Checks
by CIVATZ 2 minutes ago
Coaching scam from GM Iuri Shkuro (chessonemanager))
by kammark9 4 minutes ago
Alekhine - Lasker (New York 1924)
by BahmanM 6 minutes ago
TEAM MATCH AND VC LEADER BOARDS....
by Commander_Riker 23 minutes ago
How many people think that; Chess is just a Total Waste of Time in Life!
by gerberk 26 minutes ago
Chess books to read... Suggestions please?
by wayne_thomas 27 minutes ago
how does 2. e5 fare against the sicillian?
by strategyzrox 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!