11799 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hey :) This is my first post to the forums, with a game that strongly illustrates the value of a central Knight outpost and Kingside aggression thereafter. I want as much constructive criticism as possible on my thought process and moves, as far as ratings, I'm usually 1700 ish, just in a bad patch, ECF 143. Hope you enjoy it!
Black should try 29... Bxg5 30 g7 Rhg8.
But what about White? Any indications of faulty thought or weak play?
You're using too many ??'s when you annotate (those connote gross blunders only).
I'm asking about my play and thought processes, would you please be more constructive?
That is plenty constructive, assuming that you are willing to make use of it. Please stop being so constrictive.
What is constrictive in asking for constructive criticism of my moves? If you have a problem would you please come out with it? I'm gonna leave this thread for a couple of days to see if I get any more replies.
Knowing how to annotate properly is all part of your presentation. It is you who seem to have the problem.
I was having trouble playing against the Steinitz defense, so your commentary was very instructive, thank you.
Just 2 things:
1) I would have played 11.Bg5 instead of 11.Be3, to exchange off Black's knight. Then your knight on d5 would completely dominate Black's bishop, and the position would be strategically winning.
2) There is a lot of flashy stuff from move 27 onwards, lots of zwischenzugs, and you leave black's knight hanging for a while. When you're winning, try to win as simply as possible. It is the losing side that wants to complicate, the winning side wants to simplify. I've blown lots of winning positions by being tempted to enter complications.
7/25/2016 - What Must Be Done
by what_ever_dude a few minutes ago
How to take decisive action
by petrikeckman a few minutes ago
A sad sad loss
by brock-the-rock-star 4 minutes ago
Nimzo-Indian or Budapest Gambit
by McUmber 5 minutes ago
7/24/2016 - Attack And Defense
by Bilbo21 7 minutes ago
weak chess site. really weak.
by badger_song 9 minutes ago
by dufferps 10 minutes ago
tournaments won't let players play up?
by playe4plz 12 minutes ago
Beginner, intermediate and master... A puzzle for each
by Bilbo21 17 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by DjonniDerevnja 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!