Assume its black's move and you are talking about qxb, qxq, pxr. Black's pieces are too inactive for this to be fair compensation. Computer was likely just trying to make the best of a bad situation - looks like the queen was trapped *before* d5
Scillian sozin game, queen for rook and bishop?
Sort:
Yeah it's black's move. I was confused because the computer didn't seem to indicate black had gone wrong anywhere before losing his queen - he had 16/17 excellent moves and 4 good moves and I had 18/19 excellent and 2 good ones with 0 inaccuracies or blunders from both sides.
The free analysis is pretty rough and ready. If you analyze with a chess program running a good engine, you'll likely find some significant mistakes. That said, if the threshold for an inaccuracy is a .3 change in the evaluation (I'm not sure what the threshold is) then you can easily see how a couple of moves the computer isn't recognizing as individually all that bad add up to put you in a really bad situation.
Hi all, first time posting here asking for advice. So I played a scillian sozin attack game as White and somehow both me and my opponent played it almost perfectly for the first 21 moves each. Black then made a big blunder as he tried to defend the b6 square with the king but which also took away an escape square for the queen and b4. The computer suggests d5 for black with the idea to sac the queen for a rook and bishop (and I think on further analysis another pawn) - is this enough compensation or did black go wrong somewhere else earlier?