So this was a 'Blunder' that won me the game

Queen take bishop, Knight E4, Black move queen, knight F6 fork.

In this case it won cos black moved his queen to H5 and got it in the fork then resigned lulz.

edited moderator AndrewSmith 

Indeed, I can't see how its not a 'brilliant move' as its giving away a bishop for the rook.

If you move the knight first, then the opponent would see the fork and move the rook.

It does seem like a blunder, since you lose a point of material after sacrificing both the knight and bishop for a rook. Also, the rook is fairly passive on that square, and losing the more active bishop and knight is a big loss.

And the pawn on d4 is hanging.

Nerves of steel needed to find Qxd4! I mean that attack brewing on blacks king is brutal however you dice it!

Not really, after Qxc3 next move, you force a trade of queens before taking the rook as profit. He has no attack after that.

After 1.Bg5?! Qxg5, 2.Ne4 Qh6 What has White got? 1.Ne4! on the other hand . . ..

Very much is a blunder

Oh wow, theres something I would have never seen!

Queen was protecting that though.

Bishop was on H6 in that scenario, not on D2.

1. Ne4 is not even the only move that wins easily for white. Pretty much any reasonable normal move is overwhelmingly winning (white is at least +6).

1. Bg5 is horrible. White is barely better after that, even if black fails to find that cute Qxd4 defense.

But if the queen moves to LITERALLY ANYWHERE ELSE he doesn't get forked.

Wow, is this the worst analysis ever? It's close.

If you blunder and then your opponent blunders harder, yes you can win.

Not sure what the surprise is there.