13655 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Here is game, could anyone help me where i made mistakes? I think i did pretty good, saying he was a full 300-400 points higher and i lasted about 100 moves.
I dont mean to sound cynical, but playing on that long in a lost position is rude. If you're looking to learn you can ask him for a post-mortem, but resign if there's no escape.
Your biggest mistakes were:
9, 19, 22 (over-aggresive), 23, 24, 33, 35, 46 (Qb4+ kept you comptetive)
Akuni, I would respectfully disagree with the view that playing on that long in a lost position it "rude." I would have resigned, but that is for each individual player to decide.
In other competitive games, such as basketball, soccer, or American football, when one side has an insurmountable lead, the losing team doesn't just quit the game and default when it is obvious they are going to lose. They just continue playing the game in a sportmanlike manner, giving it their all until the end. There's nothing wrong or rude about that, in my humble opinion.
Along with that, it helps both sides with their endgame practice. I don't mind people not resigning in games that I am winning; it gives me more of such endgame practice.
Lastly, who knows, if the winning player gets careless, there may be a stalemate. It has happened even to the best.
keep oppostion king vs king and dont trade material unless it will give you an advantage or you have to.
"In other competitive games, such as basketball, soccer, or American football, when one side has an insurmountable lead, the losing team doesn't just quit the game and default when it is obvious they are going to lose. They just continue playing the game in a sportmanlike manner, giving it their all until the end. There's nothing wrong or rude about that, in my humble opinion."
these games also have time limits and spectators.
well you had a petty crazy pawn structure on your queen side, maybe that attributed to it... it was a great game though, well played.
thanks for the tips. THe reason i dragged it out is because i wanted to see how he would beat me, usually i would resign in a position like this
Staunton Chess Set Acquisition Fascinating Knights
by goodknightmike 3 minutes ago
by glamdring27 5 minutes ago
State of Chess.com Round Two! Post your questions here:
by nobodyreally 6 minutes ago
Why is it that the Live Chess Standard category encompasses so many time limits?
by Martin_Stahl 6 minutes ago
Question about a perpetual check position
by thnikka 11 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by Conflagration_Planet 13 minutes ago
by DrSpudnik 14 minutes ago
over ranked in a tounament angst!!!
by Martin_Stahl 15 minutes ago
2/7/2016 - Quick And Painless
by Diakonia 20 minutes ago
by baddogno 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!