The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥

Sort:
MarcoBR444
petrikeckman wrote:

@Marco: It is just 1-1. There gonna be a the BIG FINAL someday, in BIG Areana or stadium.! Tickets are already selled. 45,99 $

Ok, pal. As I am the King of The Patzers, my share will be 95% of the purse

I_like_GnR

Nice game guys... cheers from croatia

LogoCzar

Marco is not a bad player, just be careful when you play. He played 'A boring ECO' and carefully played me, we got to a completely drawn endgame (I won anyways). The only reason he is <1000 is because he does not always play that strong, maybe it will be more consistant soon

MarcoBR444
logozar wrote:

Marco is not a bad player, just be careful when you play. He played 'A boring ECO' and carefully played me, we got to a completely drawn endgame (I won anyways). The only reason he is <1000 is because he does not always play that strong, maybe it will be more consistant soon

Thank you Logozar. I am improving and one of the reasons are your advices.

I am sure when you become a FM or IM you will be a great chess teacher.

Two trophies for you!! And for "I-like_GNR" too! Hugs!

Samir_91
MarcoBR444 wrote:
Samir_91 wrote:

You are pure legend 

Yes, I am indeed! Thanks fan! Sent you 2 trophies and 2 for Dark_Falcon #222!

Do you want game with your fan Laughing

MarcoBR444
Samir_91 wrote:
MarcoBR444 wrote:
Samir_91 wrote:

You are pure legend 

Yes, I am indeed! Thanks fan! Sent you 2 trophies and 2 for Dark_Falcon #222!

Do you want game with your fan 

 

Yes, of course. Right now I was talking to Magnus because he insisted to talk to me to get some tips for an agressive game. Now I am available. Just send me the challenge.

imsighked2

Sorry, it was not elegant chess. it looks like the stuff I played as a beginner, where I made a lot of pawn moves with no plan. I've played against people who find openings "boring" and don't want to learn any, and they end up playing stuff like this. 

wirebolt

Beautiful games. I really like the fact that you are the 'king of the patzers".

wirebolt

Marco should go in the chess fall of fame.

MarcoBR444
wirebolt wrote:

Beautiful games. I really like the fact that you are the 'king of the patzers".

YES !!!!!!  Thanks fan !!!  MAgnus said the same as you !!!!

Two trophies sent to you !!

wirebolt

Thanks. I made some really good games myself, when I would trick my opponent into checkmate.

wirebolt

Once I learn how to post games, I might show a checkmate I managed in fourteen moves.

Warbringer33

I just can't comprehend how someone can be rated 800-900 in classical chess.

HalfSicilin

Was that against me, wirebolt?

epicness21

Warbringer, you do reliaze that marco is posting blitz games, right?

Warbringer33
epicness21 wrote:

Warbringer, you do reliaze that marco is posting blitz games, right?

 

No, I actually didn't. Why would he do such a silly, pointless thing?

One would think he would improve more by studying and playing classical games. /shrug. Maybe getting good at the game isn't his priority.

MarcoBR444
Warbringer33 wrote:

I just can't comprehend how someone can be rated 800-900 in classical chess.

No, it is in blitz and only in chess.com. And I have posting in this thread only blitz 5 minutes games, except that one against Petrike (that one was 3 days move).

 

I sometimes play in CHESS24  . COM and there my rating in blitz 5 0  is pretty better. I do not know why, but I think the users in chess.com are a bit better:

https://chess24.com/en/profile/marcoferreira#tabRating

 

c24 Bullet
1500
c24 Blitz
1429
c24 Classical
1849
Tactics Trainer Classic
1471
Tactics Trainer Speed
1500

 

 

Playzone Statistics (Rated games)

 WinsLossesDrawsGames
Winning streak: 6 gamesLosing streak: 5 games
Total 30 (58%) 19 (36%) 3 (6%) 52
White 16 (61%) 9 (35%) 1 (4%) 26
Black 14 (54%) 10 (38%) 2 (8%) 26
  • Won: 58%
  • Lost: 36%
  • Drawn: 6%
wirebolt

"iusegambits wrote:

Was that against me, wirebolt?"

No, it was against someone else.

LogoCzar

Your rating is high there because they have a starting rating of 1800 rather than 1200, which 1200 is the norm. Therefore you are overrated 600 points, which could convert to about 829 on that site, which would actually be lower than here.

MarcoBR444
logozar wrote:

Your rating is high there because they have a starting rating of 1800 rather than 1200, which 1200 is the norm. Therefore you are overrated 600 points, which could convert to about 829 on that site, which would actually be lower than here.

 

Interesting. Tks for the explanation. Two more trophies sent to you !!

However, my statistics in chess24  .com  is much better than here in chess.com. I think the players here are more chess addicts than over there.