logozar wrote:
Here I have some input
I think my queen sac was a beautiful move but miscalculated
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !! 💥
Sort:
TacticalAttack1 wrote: I think my queen sac was a beautiful move but miscalculated
Yes, your sacs were nice and in fact dangerous for me.
logozar wrote: Here I have some input #938
Nice analysis, TWO trophies for you.
Join this new tournament: Official Patzer Chess Championship:
http://www.chess.com/tournament/official-patzer-chess-championships
THE TOP GM ARE GOING TO FOLLOW THE GAMES!!!!!!
Make a wrong opening defense, then get checkmated in 14 moves.
Another masterpiece by The King of Patzers!!!
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1428274504
Comments by Bonnie Tyler as she got inspired to write the song "HE'S THE KING"
He's seen all the changes
'been going up and down
Had to rearrange it
But never lost his crown
Never was afraid of
Playing his last round
He is, he is the king
Amazing checkmate in 14 moves Marco.
it seems that playing right isnt a requirement for this thread. I think this game was brilliant!
HahXianMing wrote:
Amazing checkmate in 14 moves Marco.
Yes, but the opponent did NOT know how to defend against the fried liver opening - then got his brain fried !!!
Who did not see the PAWN PUSHER movies yet? Here the links:
Pawn Pusher 1:
PAWN PUSHER (THE KING OF PATZERS)
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/fun-with-chess/new-chess-movie-pawn-pusher---see-snapshots
Pawn Pusher 2:
PAWN PUSHER: Overcoming the Chess Addiction:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/new-chess-movie-pawn-pusher-overcoming-the-chess-addiction
PAWN PUSHER 3: THE PAWN STARS:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/new-chess-movie-pawn-pusher-3-the-pawn-stars
Pawn Pusher 4: The Future of Chess:
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/new-chess-movie-pawn-pusher-4-the-future-of-chess
===============================================
Join this new tournament: Official Patzer Chess Championship:
http://www.chess.com/tournament/official-patzer-chess-championships
THE TOP GM ARE GOING TO FOLLOW THE GAMES!!!!!!
The name of the game below is ANNOYING.
Annoying the opponent until fry his brain and win the game!!!
Chess is psychological. If you fry the opponent's brain, you will win!!
Comments by Magnus.
Jan 19, 2016
0
#873
By the way, I analyzed your tournament in my newest forum:
THE BEST OF THE BEST!!!!!
The music band THE CRASH wrote the song THE BEST OF THE BEST after have analysed the chess masterpieces by The King of Patzers!
The game below shows an unusual checkmate in 23 moves, after an also unusual opening by the opponent.
WANNA PLAY ODD OPENINGS AGAINST THE KING OF PATZERS?!?!? BETTER TAKE CARE.
Comments on the game below by Teemu Brunila, former member of THE CRASH.
The Best of the Best
The Crash
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZJqhfk1mwg
"Don't stop. We're living it fast. Feet on a one way street
Don't start, you're breaking my heart in t-t-two
Don't stop, we'll make it all right,
I know we are the best of the best,
I know we are the best of the best
I know we are the best of the best"
jackfast wrote:
logozar wrote:
shivank2005 wrote:
thanks king of patzer but there is ? i was thinking for a long time that is how we can belive that you are king of patzers
And he will probably win the tournement, regardless of the fact that a strong 1600-1700 player who earlier timed out so much he fell to 1100 joined the tournement.
I saw his game with Jackfest Coorispondance. He played like super GM according to my computer. Both of them did. Marco defended a slightly worse rook endgame practically perfectly.
The reason I haven't posted on this forum in a little while is because I had a spree of chess tournament which took up all of the time I allowed for chess. It was a bit suspicous on how Marco managed to defend an endgame where he was down a whole pawn for basically no compensation...
No, he just took his time. The rook endgame was drawn, it wasn't even a difficult one. He attacked your weaknesses faster than you did his, and had an active king, so the draw was not supprising.
jackfast wrote:
logozar wrote:
shivank2005 wrote:
thanks king of patzer but there is ? i was thinking for a long time that is how we can belive that you are king of patzers
And he will probably win the tournement, regardless of the fact that a strong 1600-1700 player who earlier timed out so much he fell to 1100 joined the tournement.
I saw his game with Jackfest Coorispondance. He played like super GM according to my computer. Both of them did. Marco defended a slightly worse rook endgame practically perfectly.
The reason I haven't posted on this forum in a little while is because I had a spree of chess tournament which took up all of the time I allowed for chess. It was a bit suspicous on how Marco managed to defend an endgame where he was down a whole pawn for basically no compensation...
Maybe...
But my computer tells me once the rook endgame started, you were never once winning by more than .8 pawns, which is not decicive and quickly was diminished due to a good plan by marco.
logozar wrote:
jackfast wrote:
logozar wrote:
shivank2005 wrote:
thanks king of patzer but there is ? i was thinking for a long time that is how we can belive that you are king of patzers
And he will probably win the tournement, regardless of the fact that a strong 1600-1700 player who earlier timed out so much he fell to 1100 joined the tournement.
I saw his game with Jackfest Coorispondance. He played like super GM according to my computer. Both of them did. Marco defended a slightly worse rook endgame practically perfectly.
The reason I haven't posted on this forum in a little while is because I had a spree of chess tournament which took up all of the time I allowed for chess. It was a bit suspicous on how Marco managed to defend an endgame where he was down a whole pawn for basically no compensation...
No, he just took his time. The rook endgame was drawn, it wasn't even a difficult one. He attacked your weaknesses faster than you did his, and had an active king, so the draw was not supprising.
Yes, I took a lot of time analysing the moves.
That game last long; sometimes Jackfast spent more than 2 days to move (that was 16 days move time). I really wanted to win that game just because the opp was Jackfast, then I spend hours and hours analysing each move.
MarcoBR444 wrote:
logozar wrote:
jackfast wrote:
logozar wrote:
shivank2005 wrote:
thanks king of patzer but there is ? i was thinking for a long time that is how we can belive that you are king of patzers
And he will probably win the tournement, regardless of the fact that a strong 1600-1700 player who earlier timed out so much he fell to 1100 joined the tournement.
I saw his game with Jackfest Coorispondance. He played like super GM according to my computer. Both of them did. Marco defended a slightly worse rook endgame practically perfectly.
The reason I haven't posted on this forum in a little while is because I had a spree of chess tournament which took up all of the time I allowed for chess. It was a bit suspicous on how Marco managed to defend an endgame where he was down a whole pawn for basically no compensation...
No, he just took his time. The rook endgame was drawn, it wasn't even a difficult one. He attacked your weaknesses faster than you did his, and had an active king, so the draw was not supprising.
Yes, I took a lot of time analysing the moves.
That game last long; sometimes Jackfast spent more than 2 days to move (that was 16 days move time). I really wanted to win that game just because the opp was Jackfast, then I spend hours and hours analysing each move.
For analysis view here:
http://en.lichess.org/acrUak0Z#107
jackfast wrote: Aside from Marco's opening, he played the top engine move every single time...
If you are accusing me of cheating, then you cheated too, because your moves were perfect. Your rating is not 2800, it is 2000 + -, then you are not able to make perfect moves.
jackfast wrote:
MarcoBR444 wrote:
jackfast wrote: Aside from Marco's opening, he played the top engine move every single time...
If you are accusing me of cheating, then you cheated too, because your moves were perfect. Your rating is not 2800, it is 2000 + -, then you are not able to make perfect moves.
How could I have cheated? Did you not see how terrible my technique was? The position was very simple, there were no tactics at all. There was almost no way I could have played worse moves. There would have been no way anyone would have been able to survive that endgame against a 2200+ player.
But how do you explain how you having a 1300 rating while playing a perfect endgame.
An intence will not to lose, to prove you wrong, and spending a long time on every move - in a simple position.
TACTICALATTACK1 tried to play like Tal, but failed - lost by checkmate in 36 moves.
If you want to sac pieces against The King of Patzers, TAKE CARE!!!!
Comments by Kasparov.
Join this new tournament: Official Patzer Chess Championship:
http://www.chess.com/tournament/official-patzer-chess-championships
I tried to brain fry not sac.