Two brilliances!!

Sort:
Avatar of gojosef
Thoughts on this game? I think it was my first game with two brilliances!!

Avatar of Finsharkotter

Wow

Avatar of SacrificedTheBlackRook

THE ROOOOOK

Avatar of SacrificeEnPassanter
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant
Avatar of gojosef
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant

I use maximum depth. Which version do you use?

Avatar of SacrificeEnPassanter
Stockfish max for own games but for this game I used Stockfish 18
Avatar of gojosef

Stockfish 18? Isn't the most recent version Stockfish 16? Is 18 de depth of analysis?

Avatar of GMPreetham07

You are a master

Avatar of gojosef

Not at all, it's just a good picture to surprise people. I'm over 1500 FIDE. You can check it in my profile

Avatar of The_Blue_J
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant

The reason probably lies in the fact that Stockfish at greater depth can predict the royal fork...

Avatar of magipi
The_Blue_J wrote:
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant

The reason probably lies in the fact that Stockfish at greater depth can predict the royal fork...

It's hard to figure out what you mean. Stockfish is extremely good at tactics at all reasonable depths. But this has nothing to do with what counts as "brilliant" on chess.com.

Avatar of HollowBlade3
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant

did you use ipad or computer?

Avatar of SacrificeEnPassanter
HorsyTheNightmare wrote:
ArjuPlayzChess wrote:
I used game review on this game, my Stockfish only shows 1 brilliant

did you use ipad or computer?

iPad.

also for everyone wondering I think Stockfish 20 is max

Avatar of Fet
Only one brilliant.
Avatar of SacrificeEnPassanter
Ye
Avatar of Optimissed

Exactly why is a knight, bishop and pawn for a rook seen as a sacrifice of the rook? happy.png

Seems like there's something wrong with their counting ability, at Chess.com.

Avatar of Thepasswordis1234

Im on maximum, and it considers Rxb4 a great move. still, great game!!1

Avatar of magipi
Optimissed wrote:

Exactly why is a knight, bishop and pawn for a rook seen as a sacrifice of the rook?

Seems like there's something wrong with their counting ability, at Chess.com.

Even the smallest temporary sacrifices are counted by chess.com's script as a sacrifice. Especially at lower rating levels. If you give up a rook for a piece and win another as a result, that counts.

The goal of chess.com is that a lot of moves should count as a "brilliant move".

Avatar of Mahmoudkhames92

Good

Avatar of hanjune2017

Great work man 👨