Was my opponent using a computer?

Sort:
rishabh11great

no he didnt use any computer at all, i am sure, white played somewhere at my level so no problem

Laskersnephew
congrandolor wrote:

Definitely he was. And you were too. Using a computer is the only way to play online chess.

Probably the most intelligent comment yet!

Laskersnephew
Superplayer2004 wrote:

I have fide raiting dude and I know he is a cheater

 

Do you have any idea how foolish and pompous that sounds?

DCC50

You realize when Your opponent uses a computer when: 

-All his games start the same

-the time of thinking has some moments and these moments are the same length

-You recognize no real human style, just "automatism"

Laskersnephew

"-All his games start the same" May human players have very narrow opening repertoires. They aren't cheating when they play the same openings over and over

"-You recognize no real human style, just "automatism""  This is just incredibly subjective and has almost no value. If a strong GM told me that his opponent "had no human style." I might believe him. But the opinion of the average guy is pretty worthless

ninja888
Oakus wrote:

Is a 98.2 accuracy a normal occurrence?

Don't use CAPS as a cheat detection tool. Anyone can get a 99 or 98 if they play well

ninja888
DCC50 wrote:

You realize when Your opponent uses a computer when: 

-All his games start the same

-the time of thinking has some moments and these moments are the same length

-You recognize no real human style, just "automatism"

I pretty much start every game the same except during bullet

IMKeto
ninja888 wrote:
Oakus wrote:

Is a 98.2 accuracy a normal occurrence?

Don't use CAPS as a cheat detection tool. Anyone can get a 99 or 98 if they play well

You dont even need to play "well"  If your opponent is playing like a pile of burning tires, all you need to do id play common sense moves, and that will get you one of them all important high cap scores.

autobunny
DCC50 wrote:

You realize when Your opponent uses a computer when: 

-All his games start the same

-the time of thinking has some moments and these moments are the same length

-You recognize no real human style, just "automatism"

When... He connects to the internet. 

The internet to smoke signal gateway isn't very reliable and leads to timeouts very often. 

Commando_Droid

Public accusations are not allowed. Report your opponent privately and the case will be reviewed by the Chess.com team. The forum should be locked.

Oakus
kingandqueen2017 wrote:

Public accusations are not allowed. Report your opponent privately and the case will be reviewed by the Chess.com team. The forum should be locked.

The game was on Lichess so this is allowed

Oakus

Definitely immature for me to post this. My opponent didn't cheat. Also, can pfren just delete his account, please?

autobunny
Oakus wrote:

Definitely immature for me to post this. My opponent didn't cheat. Also, can pfren just delete his account, please?

Doesn't look like he should be the one to go, with this on your profile. Why do you stay? Could be a win win. Just saying. 

I hate chess.com. Just go on Lichess.

Oakus
autobunny wrote:
Oakus wrote:

Definitely immature for me to post this. My opponent didn't cheat. Also, can pfren just delete his account, please?

Doesn't look like he should be the one to go, with this on your profile. Why do you stay? Could be a win win. Just saying. 

I hate chess.com. Just go on Lichess.

All I do here are the forums. Chess.com sucks. 

autobunny
Oakus wrote:
autobunny wrote:
Oakus wrote:

Definitely immature for me to post this. My opponent didn't cheat. Also, can pfren just delete his account, please?

Doesn't look like he should be the one to go, with this on your profile. Why do you stay? Could be a win win. Just saying. 

I hate chess.com. Just go on Lichess.

All I do here are the forums. Chess.com sucks. 

So you're going for a lose lose situation? 

Oakus
autobunny wrote:
Oakus wrote:
autobunny wrote:
Oakus wrote:

Definitely immature for me to post this. My opponent didn't cheat. Also, can pfren just delete his account, please?

Doesn't look like he should be the one to go, with this on your profile. Why do you stay? Could be a win win. Just saying. 

I hate chess.com. Just go on Lichess.

All I do here are the forums. Chess.com sucks. 

So you're going for a lose lose situation? 

I really don't understand

2Ke21-0
Oakus wrote:
autobunny wrote:
Oakus wrote:
autobunny wrote:
Oakus wrote:

Definitely immature for me to post this. My opponent didn't cheat. Also, can pfren just delete his account, please?

Doesn't look like he should be the one to go, with this on your profile. Why do you stay? Could be a win win. Just saying. 

I hate chess.com. Just go on Lichess.

All I do here are the forums. Chess.com sucks. 

So you're going for a lose lose situation? 

I really don't understand

I don't really understand what you really don't understand. Help us so we can help you!

autobunny

If mammary serves right, automods don't like the mention of tits or tats. 

Happy_Trails_4

98+% on moves is very high for an average player.  65+% to maybe 80% is what a 1300-1500 elo player might typically get.  Your opponent likely sought advice from the "oracle" on at least certain key moves which had the player in question flummoxed.

CdotC, I must say, is very good at shutting such "oracle" seeking players down without prejudice.  The issue is that it takes time, and several games before the smoking gunn has emitted enough stinch for a determination to be made.  One game is not enough.

sgoust17

hey wanna play

 

This forum topic has been locked