... a series for the tournament player (and not the novice) ...
Is this a thread that is only about the novice?
"Do we have a Style when we are begginer-intermediate level players? ..." - Guilax in post #1
... a series for the tournament player (and not the novice) ...
Is this a thread that is only about the novice?
"Do we have a Style when we are begginer-intermediate level players? ..." - Guilax in post #1
… A player has a long way to go before he starts creating an opening repertoire based on his style. ...
"... you must choose what openings you will be using. This choice depends on your taste and also on the character and style of your game. If you like to attack and you are not afraid of sacrificing and taking risks choose sharp gambit openings. If you prefer a quiet game, then there are relatively calm openings for you. ..." - Journey to the Chess Kingdom by Yuri Averbakh and Mikhail Beilin
“... 'Journey to the Chess Kingdom' ... is primarily intended for children ..." - WGM Natalia Pogonina (2014)
https://www.chess.com/blog/Natalia_Pogonina/book-review-quotjourney-to-the-chess-kingdomquot
I think your style is to develope pieces and you like complex positions. My suggestion is to pay more attention on what your opponent is trying to do. If your opponent attack a pawn, sometime is good to avoid a passive position and try a counterattack. The second game you lost is very instructive. Instead of Re8-c8 to defend the pawn, I would have played Qg6 without too much calculating. And also I don't like Bb6-c7 because you loose control of e row (better Re8).
You are right in those plays. In the first I lost opportunity to have a more offensive game. In the second I totally lost control of the e row.
What do you mean exactly with develop pieces and like complex positions? Is not that contradictory with what you say afterwards: little search of counterattack and defense of a pawn when it is not necessary?
Yes, you are right, I have to explain better. During the game your style is to develope pieces so you prefer to create active games. That's very good. The only problem in that after having well developed your pieces, if your opponent attack an unprotected pawn, if you defend it, just be sure that there is not another active move. Generally speaking, when one player has a good development (pieces are well placed in active squares), one pawn is not so important, so you can loose it, if you found a counterattack. In the second game you loose the e row and at this point white was a little bit better Instead of playing a passive move like Re8-c8 (to protect the pawn), you should have found an active way to create new active play. So why Qg6. You will loose a pawn, but you will have more practical chances to draw the game.
I help run 1 day scholastic tournaments, and you hear this a lot from kids. NO ONE with a decent level of ability says this crap. Because they understand youre playing the position on the board, not a "style"
I help run 1 day scholastic tournaments, and you hear this a lot from kids. NO ONE with a decent level of ability says this crap. Because they understand youre playing the position on the board, not a "style"
"How would you characterize your style?" - IM Georgios Souleidis (2011)
"Very tactical. I like playing open positions with a lot of space." - GM Hikaru Nakamura (2011)
"... these days all grandmasters know very well that chess isn't only about playing good moves. In the majority of positions, there are a number of possible moves of roughly equal merit, ..." - GM John Nunn (2014)
I help run 1 day scholastic tournaments, and you hear this a lot from kids. NO ONE with a decent level of ability says this crap. Because they understand youre playing the position on the board, not a "style"
"How would you characterize your style?" - IM Georgios Souleidis (2011)
"Very tactical. I like playing open positions with a lot of space." - GM Hikaru Nakamura (2011)
"... Quoting grandmasters who have evolved their 'style' through thousands of hours of study and thousands of competitive chess games doesn't seem to have much relevance to 1200 players wondering "what's my style? ..." - mickynj
As you can see, I was reacting to someone making a statement about "NO ONE with a decent level of ability" and about "playing the position on the board".
... Hikaru ... And at every move, he doesn't ask himself "what's my style," ...
Is anyone advocating that one ask oneself "what's my style" at every move?
... As I said , novices that ...
Is this a thread that is only about the novice?
"Do we have a Style when we are begginer-intermediate level players? ..." - Guilax in post #1
... You would know that if you weren't a total ignorant and if you weren't trying to sell books. ...
I am not trying to sell books.
I help run 1 day scholastic tournaments, and you hear this a lot from kids. NO ONE with a decent level of ability says this crap. Because they understand youre playing the position on the board, not a "style"
"How would you characterize your style?" - IM Georgios Souleidis (2011)
"Very tactical. I like playing open positions with a lot of space." - GM Hikaru Nakamura (2011)
"... Quoting grandmasters who have evolved their "style" through thousands of hours of study and thousands of competitive chess games doesn't seem to have much relevance to 1200 players wondering "what's my style? ..." - mickynj
As you can see, I was reacting to someone making a statement about "NO ONE with a decent level of ability" and about "playing the position on the board".
... The "tactical" Nakamura plays Berlin as much as Sicilian. How do you explain that?
Did anyone claim that style is the only factor in move choice?
You put this under Game Analysis, and added no analysis...
disproven