What is the difference (Lichess and chess.com analysis)??

Sort:
Attack_Always_Attack

{REMOVED}

These types of threads are not allowed on public forums.

I got the point anyway, thanks.

Slayerofbishopsandqueens
I wouldn’t worry about being banned if you weren’t cheating, I’ve never heard of chess.com falsely banning someone for cheating, however I do hear that lichess isn’t as accurate at ratings as chess.com is, but I could be wrong
pugl14

You won't get banned. I have a lot of perfect 100 accuracy games because of traps like the Fried Liver, and i'm not banned.

Laskersnephew

Nobody gets banned because of a high accuracy score--ever! Chess.com and lichess have complex proprietary cheat detection programs that look at a number of factor when analyzing a game. Don't get hysterical every time you get an extremely high accuracy rating. It doesn't really mean much

magipi
Attack_Always_Attack wrote:

However, I am more curious of this accuracy difference. Why is the evaluation so different?

Different engines (maybe), different depths. And most importantly: different methodology. Chess.com calls something "accuracy", and lichess calls something else "accuracy", and obviously those two things are not the same. How could they be?

GreatoduTheFirst

lichess has variant engines but chess.com analysis is in a way little bit better

CaroKannEnjoyer02
GreatoduTheFirst wrote:

lichess has variant engines but chess.com analysis is in a way little bit better

I disagree. I think the analysis boards of lichess are WAY better. You get MUCH more game review, (request computer analysis) you can see what people play most common based off elo instead of just what masters play, you can make studies to save your analysis (much better than chess.com libraries) and on top of that, the lichess stockfish has much higher depth, going commonly up to 40 plys!