what is the engine of chess.com analysis? does anybody know that?

Sort:
sophia1981

and who knows what the best engine for analysis?

rich123456
[COMMENT DELETED]
vickalan
sophia1981 wrote:

what is the engine of chess.com analysis? does anybody know that?

I believe it's stockfish js.6. Right?

ArtNJ

It doesn't matter, because it doesn't run on your computer's resources, instead the chess.com servers dole out an itsy bitsy teeny weenie bit of processing power.  At least, that is my understanding.  I am not sure why it is done this way, as free competitors to chess.com run the analysis off your personal computer, resulting in vastly better analysis.  Maybe there is a good reason for it, but the cynic in me thinks they deliberately hobble the free analysis to give another reason to upgrade to premium.  

kevin1060472

There is a stockfish 8 now, right? Shouldn't that be better?

vickalan
ArtNJ wrote:

It doesn't matter, because it doesn't run on your computer's resources...

But the processing still needs to be based on some code (whether locally or on chess.com's servers). I believe the engine is stockfish, but let me know if I'm not correct.

kevin1060472

I believe that it is some version of stock fish and that different engines are quite different and can have ratings that differ by up to a point or two. 

Martin_Stahl
vickalan wrote:
sophia1981 wrote:

what is the engine of chess.com analysis? does anybody know that?

I believe it's stockfish js.6. Right?

 

The current one is, but when this was started in 2015, the v2 engine may have been something else.

 

For v3, premium can do deeper analysis but a lot of people use their own engines for deep analysis on a local machine.

kevin1060472

Anyways, you can download the Arena Chess GUI and Stockfish 8 both for free, and get arguably the best analysis in the world. 

nimzomalaysian
sadotra_karan wrote:

there may be some engine, but if u think to cheat on ches.com with a engine u will caught and your account will be banned.

Thanks for the information captain obvious.