Forums

Why did the other resign?

Sort:
Avatar of etearello
etearello
Mar 15, 2008
0
#1

Hi all.

I am a casual player who is getting engaged with chess lately. I've played a game where the opponent resigned and I don't understand why.

Anyway, I just want to know if my 10. Ne6 is an interesting move.

 

 

I hope you the experts could help me saying if the moves were good and/or if any big mistake was made.

Thank you very much


Avatar of Nightshadow
Nightshadow
Mar 16, 2008
0
#2

This is fine. Black is at no loss. He should probably continue with Nh5 now.

Ne6 was good because of its intimidation factor which might scare people into playing badly but it's fine because both played it out well.


Avatar of KillaBeez
KillaBeez
Mar 16, 2008
0
#3
Bb5+ was useless.  You moved your bishop back anyways.  Why not play Nxf7 winning the exchange after Bh6?
Avatar of God2
God2
Mar 16, 2008
0
#4
well,maybe he think ur a nice guy
Avatar of pip08
pip08
Mar 17, 2008
0
#5

If I was black, I would have exchanges horses earlier on.

 Also I rarely ever resign. Certainly not with two rooks and a queen.


Avatar of dalmatinac
dalmatinac
Mar 17, 2008
0
#6
I like white bishop in this position but in this position resign is bad move,unexpected from black.Black could play this.There is no good reason for resignation.
Avatar of catfishcore
catfishcore
Mar 17, 2008
0
#7
I would not resign if I was black, but I think whites F pawn can jump on the E knight  and help force an opening to the black king. I feel that Black is in trouble in two perhaps three moves. White is showing some good attacking  skills.