Why is this not a brilliant


First, 1.Re8 is "questionable" because it wins the equivalent of a pawn, while the simple 1.Rae1 leads to quick checkmate.
But anyway, in this position white is a whole rook up. One may claim half a dozen of moves being "brilliant".

But anyway, in this position white is a whole rook up. One may claim half a dozen of moves being "brilliant".
Yes, that's the point. The "brilliant" label is not awarded if the player is overwhelmingly winning anyway no matter what.

What? No.