Your games realistically analyzed by The King of Patzers 💥

Sort:
Nikprit
trysts wrote:

He's a guy, just like Bruce Jenner was

LOL 

MarcoBR444

Here is the analysis of Trysts' game:



Now you owe me US$ 0,25 !!

Congratulations! You are the first paid customer of the great THE KING OF PATZERS CHESS ANALYSIS, INC.!

trysts

OMG, that's hilarious!Laughing Thank you, MarcoBR444:D

Nikprit

I thought so too, I laughed like anything.  

trysts

I know! I read through it twiceLaughing I especially like when he said, "I like it! You play a nice psychological move and I consider it Brain Frying"Laughing

mating_threats

Why do you say castling is for pinkie- pantie-sissies?

MarcoBR444
chris_xiang wrote:

Why do you say castling is for pinkie- pantie-sissies?

Because sissies love the pink colour.

For details, read:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/castling-is-for-sissies

Robert_New_Alekhine

Marco, please analyze my win vs. Computer Impossible:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/i-beat-computer-4-impossible2?lc=1#last_comment 

Robert_New_Alekhine
Nikprit wrote:

don't know who that is Bob. It comes up as a female when I run google, in that case I agree, but another search took me to a guy, which I don't agree with. Then another search took me to the 'oldest Honda dealer in Utah', which in that case - I don't understand what you are talking about

Ask her/him & see the reply you get. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Jorgensen

MarcoBR444
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:

Ok, just gimme some minutes. You must be aware you will owe me US$ 0,25 for the analysis.

Robert_New_Alekhine

Well, I'll give you amazing comments on one of your games for free, so can you give me this game for free? Please? 

Robert_New_Alekhine

I analyzed your game, now analyze mine! 

MarcoBR444

Here the analysis of RNA vs COMPUTER IMPOSSIBLE.


Of course, now you owe me US$ 0,25 for the analysis.

THE KING OF PATZERS CHESS ANALYSIS, INC., is glad to help our valuated customers!

MarcoBR444
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:

Well, I'll give you amazing comments on one of your games for free, so can you give me this game for free? Please? 

No, you asked for the analysis as shown in this thread. Sorry, but I already finished the job. You owe me only US$ 0,25, it is cheap, no big deal.

Robert_New_Alekhine

Couple of notes:

Isolated pawn often offers compensation in the form of attacking on the kingside. After studying the Brain Fry Attack, I am convinced that it would extremely well in such a situation.

After Qxd4, White has a lot of compensation for the pawn - I wasn't worried about it much.

In your analysis of 13.d5, you do not consider 14...exd5 and black has the bishop pair with a slightly better position.

After 14...Nh5 I would most likely play 15.Bxe7. If 15...Qxe7, then 16.d5! gives black Brain Fries, and if 16...Nxe7, then 17.Bc2.

You are correct that Qd3 is better than Nxd5 on move 34. I just didn't want to give the computer any chances and decided to go into a simple 2-pawn up endgame.

Thanks for the comment about IM - I sure hope but I don't think it will be possible.

Great analysis generally, thank you very much! 

MarcoBR444

THE KING OF PATZERS CHESS ANALYSIS, INC., is proud to publish its first FINANCIAL REPORTS!

It is a preparation for the upcoming IPO in NASDAQ.

 


MarcoBR444

THE KING OF PATZERS CHESS ANALYSIS, INC., is proud to annouce an alternative business plan!

The plan is to produce a new kind of bread, specially made for chess players.

It is well designed to give good energy for chess tournaments (internet and OTB), full of the best nutritional elements. 


MarcoBR444
Rob3rtJamesFischer wrote:

Can I get this endgame analyzed, I feel like I blundered and let my opponent get a draw. 

Well, as THE KING OF PATZERS CHESS ANALYSIS, INC., is a professional company, I need to ask you:

Who is gonna pay for the analysis service? Note that you are dead and, according to commercial laws, we can not collect debt from dead people.

MarcoBR444
Rob3rtJamesFischer wrote:

Charge it to my lovely Japanese wife. I don't want to go back with Lord Jesus without knowing if my game was perfect or not.

Ok, I will make the analysis, just some minutes.

IareBatman

Your A/R should be .50 and bad debt expense should .50 be in the liability section. 

Aint gonna get investors with financial reporting like that!