Cool
I enjoyed this game.
Sort:
Dec 21, 2024
0
#6
This looks like a game a 2000 would play, there is only one thing I could see that you could’ve done differently. On move 33 you played a3 overlooking the fact that after you trade pawns your king can go to g5 & take the pawn. But since you were still winning it wasn’t really a mistake.
Brilliant!!!
Huh a game
nakaru approved
Dec 24, 2024
0
#10
My main reservation about the way you handled the opening phase of the game is this:
As early as move 8, two pairs of minor pieces (Bishop and Knight) had already been traded off. Within two more moves, another pair of pieces were traded. The game had already been greatly simplified and had become extremely drawish (+0.1) ... by move 10!
Couldn't you have chosen an opening method that didn't involve so many early exchanges? Keep the game more complex?
Instead of 4. d3 followed by 5. Bg5 (which almost commits you to that series of exchanges) I would have considered either 4. f4 transposing into a gambit where Black's 3. ... g6 move now looks ridiculous, or 4. Nf3 where 4. ... Bg4? gets hammered by 5. Nxe5!! Bxd1 6. Bxf7+ Ke7 7. Nd5 checkmate.
I agree with Blueemu’s comments.
Black’s …d6 I very passive. Black’s … g6 is slow.
so, black handed you a time advantage in the opening. Your playing Bg5, Nd5, and the exchanging at f6 squanders the advantage.
As Blueemu said, black’s passive opening play calls for a dynamic reaction. I think avoiding exchanges, playing for f4 or h4-h5, and going for an attack is the way to go.
I just randomly played a blitz chess game earlier. Also if any higher rated player wants to share a few explanations about the game it would be fine, just no offense please.
Here is the game:
Am I bad in king and pawn endgames or not lol-