Its a bit unsportsmanlike to keep on rubbing this in.
Very unsportsmanlike(he gets 4 queens!!!!!)
Sort:
May 25, 2009
0
#203
PauGutierrez wrote:
Rainbow, well you should check his game archive, He has done that several times.
make your conlcusions
Ej dirst is a SHE, not a HE.
May 25, 2009
0
#204
I made 5 rooks against some fool not bright enough to resign today! Was alot of fun actually.
NabeelDaSorcerer wrote:
ChessMastora wrote:
I think there's some ideological conflict going on here, Eastern people like the Chinese and Japanese fight to the last man- demonstrated during the Japanese invasion of China and when the Americans were 'island hopping'; Western people have an idea of conserving forces by surrendering (and hopefully regain that conserved energy by recapturing the land-sorta like rematch) , demonstrated by prisoner statistics.
It wasn't a fight between a NINJA and a SAMURAI .
LOL, that is good :)
x34xElfekix34x wrote:
Well First off I hardly ever quit, Secondly I was kinda hoping for a stalemate
That's a very disrespectful attitude. Your opponent beat you handily and yet you think he's going to be so dumb as to leave you in stalemate?
I could understand if there was something instructive about the endgame (ie, B&N vs K) giving you both practise but by move 40 it was finished.
He should have promoted to bring all his pieces back and return them to their starting squares.
pizzaking wrote:
x34xElfekix34x wrote:
Well First off I hardly ever quit, Secondly I was kinda hoping for a stalemate
That's a very disrespectful attitude. Your opponent beat you handily and yet you think he's going to be so dumb as to leave you in stalemate?
I could understand if there was something instructive about the endgame (ie, B&N vs K) giving you both practise but by move 40 it was finished.
He should have promoted to bring all his pieces back and return them to their starting squares.
Disrespectful for not resigning?? Rubbish!!
Disrespectful for complaining I could accept!
wealybinn wrote:
whats the point of chess if you resign? (in my opinion it is giving up!) I am proud of the fact that I have never resigned a rated game on chess.com throughout the time I have been on this site.I believe where there's a game there's a draw!
What a martyr....
Ever seen someone going slower than the speed limit in traffic and holding up the person behind them?
Now, ever seen the person who was held up race around and slow to a crawl in front of the driver who did the original impeding?
Both parties are showing a lack of consideration, but while the initial party could arguably just be ignorant the latter party is clearly demonstrating spiteful behaviour, and what's worse -- it's completely counterproductive if their point is that they dislike being held up.
Now, for either driver to take the matter to a wider audience for consideration or resolution of any kind is completely asinine.
May 25, 2009
0
#211
I do like that he was making fun of your name. Obviously understands irony about as much as sarcasm :[
I can understand a coach being lazy and telling him never to resign, but the thing is, there's absolutely nothing you can learn by watching your opponent move each pawn up the board, even if he stalemates you don't actually learn anything, you just lucked out. Just seems entirely useless to try for it, and seriously, making 30 forced king moves is just sad..
Suggo wrote:
pizzaking wrote:
x34xElfekix34x wrote:
Well First off I hardly ever quit, Secondly I was kinda hoping for a stalemate
That's a very disrespectful attitude. Your opponent beat you handily and yet you think he's going to be so dumb as to leave you in stalemate?
I could understand if there was something instructive about the endgame (ie, B&N vs K) giving you both practise but by move 40 it was finished.
He should have promoted to bring all his pieces back and return them to their starting squares.
Disrespectful for not resigning?? Rubbish!!
Disrespectful for complaining I could accept!
Disrespectful for not resigning because he was merely hoping for stalemate.
Fight til the end as long as you have fight left.
The only reason to continue playing a lost endgame is if you want your opponent to prove that he knows how to do win it or for you to practise defending it. Good examples would be B&N vs K or R&B vs R. For beginners, this could be extended to a lot of endgames but there was no value in extending this game for anyone.
He didn't have to resign, strictly speaking. It's the reason why he didn't resign that is disrespectful, as is his complaining about his opponent's behaviour.
His reason wasn't disrespectful...he is allowed to hope for a mistake and get a draw, it is up to the other player to checkmate him! It is his choice to play on, and it was the other players choice to get 786 queens...neither disrespectful if they both choose to continue.
Like I said before, I'll cop the disrepectful bit about the complaining afterward!
lol, knights is more fun than queens. People who don't resign get what they ask for, more game by their opponent, however their opponent feels like playing it. If you don't want it to happen, resign. Don't pretend like you weren't subjected to something extremely amusing to everybody else because of your own stubbornness. (P.S. it's more disrespectful not to resign by move 25 or 36)
Suggo wrote:
His reason wasn't disrespectful...he is allowed to hope for a mistake and get a draw, it is up to the other player to checkmate him! It is his choice to play on, and it was the other players choice to get 786 queens...neither disrespectful if they both choose to continue.
Like I said before, I'll cop the disrepectful bit about the complaining afterward!
786 Queens? Wow. Ideally it is impossible to have more than 9 Queens. Even if there is a miracle, where would they stand on a board with 64 Squares (and one occupied by "x34xElfekix34x's" NOT-RESIGNING King? 
. lol
Nabeel, you are big on trying to make people resign, why aren't you ripping into this guy??
Suggo wrote:
Nabeel, you are big on trying to make people resign, why aren't you ripping into this guy??
Hey suggo! are you really sure of that? I would rather love this guy face a forced mate as is loved by some big mouths and big shots?
Yep, I am quite sure of that...and had you not disabled (did you think to do that as you wrote your post? LOL) the chat from our game I would have shown you why!
Suggo wrote:
Yep, I am quite sure of that...and had you not disabled (did you think to do that as you wrote your post? LOL) the chat from our game I would have shown you why!
As I had told you so, this guy has also well understood now that a BOARD SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. Poor kid though.
BTW, you awoke a few centuries late. I dont even remember how old this topic is.
Your end game was not too strong - after you get two queens down you should resign if you have no way to win.
But, there could always be a possiblility of a draw. Tournament play if should depend on your standings during the tournament. Open play you should resign.