Accuracy % by Chess Rating?

me player with 1600 rating => avg accuracy 75%

Said some brit with less than 1000 elo,

I’m 822 and just played a 25 move game game with 88.4 accuracy. Only one inaccuracy lol.

I once got 100% accuracy.

https://www.chess.com/game/live/72387132949

Woah I'm 888 rapid and I get 80 to 90 pretty often

I GOT 92.4 accuracy at 624 in bullet game

I get lots of 99-point-somethings, but usually in rather short games... which typically means that these high numbers are just an artifact of the way that the score is being calculated.

How many moves was the game?

https://lichess.org/G6eKX9QE , well thats my record

Bruh my blunder accuracy is 100%

I am also 100% accurate at finding horrible blunders to play.

TL;DR game accuracy means nothing, average accuracy means everything.

Average accuracy should not be confused with single game accuracy. I’d go so far as to say getting a 90+% game accuracy isn’t much of an accomplishment, lots of beginners will have a personal best that high. For ELO upto about 2000 every 1.8% increase in average accuracy is roughly 100 points of ELO (someone on chess.com did the curve fit). I suspect when chess.com analyzes your game and says you played like a 1400 player they are plugging in the game accuracy into the line fit of ELO vs average accuracy.

For Americans: it is like batting average in baseball. Going 1 for 2 means you are batting 500 ….nobody cares, no matter who was pitching. Do it for a season and you are the greatest player that ever lived.

Totally agree.

On the other hand... the single-game "performance rating" is as funny as stand-up comedy, as long as you don't actually take it seriously.

... not bad for a 33-move, highly complex tactical game.

Is it harder tho to get a higher accuracy against a better opponent. Therefore could your accuracy difference taken into account.

I was 420 elo at the time of writing and I got a 87.3 accuracy in a 42 move with one mistake and 3 inaccuracy game so I don't think You can find a really accurate average.

I am between 1950 - 2050 in rapid lately and my avg accuracy is just under 80%, with obviously higher and lower accuracy games, so scoring 70% or even 50-60% and STILL WINNING is definitely still possible at this level. It depends a lot on the complexity of the positions between weaker and stronger players, but also on the styles of the players and the opening repertoire.. some will go for main lines, some will go for crazy complications early.

The tactical problems that higher rated players create are much more difficult to solve, and amateurs would score less than 50% very likely if they are asked to make moves responding to top players.

So yeah, it depends, but there should still be a average for each rating group... So I am still curious too

my highest is 91 accuracy and i am only 1216 rated!