am i too old to play ?

Sort:
nuxenKhang2013
Bobison123 đã viết:

Vâng chắc chắn

no

bumpa329
WongEthanLY wrote:
bumpa329 wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
RemovedUsername7492874 wrote:
bumpa329 wrote:

You are not too old but you may be too ugly.

you're never too ugly to play chess, just look at any over the board tournament...

he said it in a mean way…

You can always tell which posts are made by children.

You can also tell which posts are made by people who don’t know why they are talking about this and what they are talking about.

ok, 9 year old.

Robbos_Heir
Your rapid rating is higher than mine and I‘m above 2000 FIDE. So, yes, of course you can achieve that.
puzzlesolver58

never too old

MaetsNori
chesssblackbelt wrote:

You're never too old to play but why would you even want to play chess as an adult... Don't you lot have mortgages and stuff to deal with.

Why would you even want to play chess as a kid ... don't you lot have school and stuff to deal with? tongue.png

fowgre

I'm 73 and play chess because I enjoy it. That's all that matters.

bumpa329
chesssblackbelt wrote:

Even if he's 9, he's higher rated than you so knows what he's talking about more

first of all ratings are irrelevant to this conversation. second, i am rated almost 1,000 points higher than him in daily and i am 3 and 0 in my rapids games, numb nuts.

basixTheSwexiest
You’re only 1000 in daily…
bumpa329
chesssblackbelt wrote:

All the low rated 2000 fides on this site make me think I can get titled this summer lol. I beat this 1950 rapid guy twice in 10+0 when bongclouding...

make no mistake. you can't.

BigChessplayer665
StockedFishy_29 wrote:

Nobody cares about daily rating though, what matters is rapid or bullet

Your forgeting about blitz 🤦

bumpa329
StockedFishy_29 wrote:

Nobody cares about daily rating though, what matters is rapid or bullet

and your point is...

MacarioniandCheese
If your at the point where you have to write your will then yes your too old
dokerbohm

too old to play ----no no!!!!!!----to old to win thats different

PikachuIronMan
bumpa329 wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
bumpa329 wrote:
WongEthanLY wrote:
RemovedUsername7492874 wrote:
bumpa329 wrote:

You are not too old but you may be too ugly.

you're never too ugly to play chess, just look at any over the board tournament...

he said it in a mean way…

You can always tell which posts are made by children.

You can also tell which posts are made by people who don’t know why they are talking about this and what they are talking about.

ok, 9 year old.

ok

PikachuIronMan
chesssblackbelt wrote:

Even if he's 9, he's higher rated than you so knows what he's talking about more

thank you

PikachuIronMan
bumpa329 wrote:
StockedFishy_29 wrote:

Nobody cares about daily rating though, what matters is rapid or bullet

and your point is...

that bullet and rapid is better than daily

PikachuIronMan
bumpa329 wrote:
chesssblackbelt wrote:

Even if he's 9, he's higher rated than you so knows what he's talking about more

first of all ratings are irrelevant to this conversation. second, i am rated almost 1,000 points higher than him in daily and i am 3 and 0 in my rapids games, numb nuts.

I am literally almost 2000 in puzzles

you forgot bullet

never played blitz?

PikachuIronMan
selocan1106316 wrote:

hi guys,
i am 37 years old, i am playing chess over 22 years but not seriously, in 2023 summer , i decided to take chess seriously,i applied licance and participated 12 tournements until now, 2 of them were elo tournements, rest is national rating ukd, like uscf of turkey, my starting fide elo after 2 tournements 1738, my chess com rapid is 2140 around right now, my lichess rapid is 2260 around, my question is am i underrated, and should continue fide tournements, to reach above 2000 fide classical, or am i quite old and it is not a realistic goal?
thanks, my best regards

Sorry but ummm I think you started a war in the comments 😅😅

blueemu
WongEthanLY wrote:

Sorry but ummm I think you started a war in the comments 😅😅

catsrulec
You are never to old to play chess ♟️