Is this what you mean? It's very common... but usually people resign before being checkmated.
http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=7465957
Is this what you mean? It's very common... but usually people resign before being checkmated.
http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=7465957
I assume you mean (for example) that white gives check, black moves in such a way as to check white's king, and then white moves to checkmate black.
Currently, the record for such "consecutive checks" stands at 51 (see entry #378 at http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/diary.htm), but these are specially designed problem positions and not over-the-board games.
Freecat, slightly OT, but is there a name for that opening you used? Irregular KID/modern defense? Something else? Thanks.
AquaMan wrote:
Freecat, slightly OT, but is there a name for that opening you used? Irregular KID/modern defense? Something else? Thanks.
Chessbase names it "Tartakower System-Modern Defence". ECO code is A41, I think.
EDIT: No theory at all, just intuition.
Neophyte123, see the games showcase forum. A lot of those games end in check check mate. A couple near the top of the forum list right now are "classic smothered mate," and "the stonewall attack."
http://www.chess.com/forum/category/game-showcase
FreeCat wrote:
AquaMan wrote:
Freecat, slightly OT, but is there a name for that opening you used? Irregular KID/modern defense? Something else? Thanks. Chessbase names it "Tartakower System-Modern Defence". ECO code is A41, I think. EDIT: No theory at all, just intuition.
Yeah, I saw Big DB 2008 only had about 5 games with the same position after move 5. But still left wondering if one side's move order was intuitive (and if so, which) or both. I asked because a Chessmaster opponent keeps beating my practice Reti with something like that.
AquaMan wrote:
FreeCat wrote:
AquaMan wrote:
Freecat, slightly OT, but is there a name for that opening you used? Irregular KID/modern defense? Something else? Thanks. Chessbase names it "Tartakower System-Modern Defence". ECO code is A41, I think. EDIT: No theory at all, just intuition. Yeah, I saw Big DB 2008 only had about 5 games with the same position after move 5. But still left wondering if one side's move order was intuitive (and if so, which) or both. I asked because a Chessmaster opponent keeps beating my practice Reti with something like that.
My first option is playing the Pirc, if it is not possible, then I play similar defences, like this one. So I always face similar combos, and I can tell you white's fianchetto in the kingside seems not to be very common against modern/Pirc defences. If i had to play this as white, I would avoid the kingside fianchetto.
I think it was intuitive for both sides, but I had the advantage of having played a lot of games with similar defences, and probably my opponent was more unsure about what he had to do than me.
Hi there.
I’m pretty much chess illiterate, (I can’t for the life of me decode the game diagrams) and am looking for a match to study that ends in check-check-checkmate.
I’ve been searching for a while with no luck. Does anyone know of such a game? Maybe an old championship game?
Please help! Thank you!