- I vote with all the people who say for all kinds of reasons not everyone can be a super gm
- and then it occurred to me that this game is proof positive I cannot be a super g m
- like I make dumb moves and leave players "hanging" grand masters don't
- and when it came to one part of this game I made a dumb mistake and put my rook into take by a bishop
HOWEVER - I MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING GOING BY ATTACKING WITH THE ROOK FIRST - but in the attitude of can't be a g m - - when I have a rook and queen in my attack - I WILL ALWAYS ATTACK WITH MY QUEEN FIRST - it is MY KNEE JERK reaction - attack with queen first because queen is more versatile - - however - I think a g m - would actually THINK FIRST - - and when I look at this game I think I should have otter have attacked with the rook first
AT MOVE 48 I THINK I SHOULD HAVE ATTACKED NOT WITH QUEEN BUT ATTACKED WITH ROOK FIRST
- however I won the game on time - but even now I don't know how I should have approached and stage and move my pieces for a win
- well I think a chess master would
well maybe everyone else in the world could be a super gm - well I know I can't - like that fighter pilot movie - only I don't have the right stuff
A lot of people claim anything is possible. But we have to remember that because "anything" is possible does not mean "everything" is possible. Ratings are based on how much ahead of the average players are. If everyone starts being a GM, then that would just mean that the standard of being a GM would go up.
Not only is everything possible, everything is.