Mess up in chess, you lose a game.
Mess up in philosophy, you get refuted.
But mess up in bench press, and you go to the hospital.
Binary Logic
Sort:
I'll tell you what, though...
Mess up in chess, you lose a game.
Mess up in philosophy, you get refuted.
But mess up in bench press, and you go to the hospital.
Mess up in chess, you lose a game.
Mess up in philosophy, you get refuted.
But mess up in bench press, and you go to the hospital.
May 24, 2017
0
#3
ChumpDavis123 wrote:
In the beginning BA created the Heavens and the Earth
Binary logic is where B explains A and A explains B. Since humans are very capable of this depth of understanding, we can model a description of reality with the manifolds A and B. There is also a form of logic, where A is always correct even when B, the opposition, is also correct. This is called logical connectivism. The reason of course is that A is the relationship between A and B, but A focuses on the individual and center, but draws everything in, and B is the logic that tries to define everything in a restrictive and unempathic way. Why are A and B related? Because B is an extension of A. A is the subjective simplicity of reality, and B is the definitive and descriptive placeholder for A's consistency of being. A is subjective and B is countersubjective. But without the complexity and subjectivity of A and/or B, you can't have either. This is the basic concept of philosophy
May 24, 2017
0
#5
Many complex problems, even chess ones, are most easily solved by breaking them down into a series of binary-type problems. It's true the King is in check so it's also true my only possible move is to get the King out of check. It's true moving my Q doesn't uncheck the King so it is false that my next move with be a Queen move.
It's kind of like those logic problems where the Dog tells the truth only on Mon, Wed, Fri, and Sat. and the Cat only tells the truth on Sun, Tues, Thurs, and Fri. The Dog says something and the Cat replies and from that you must elucidate which day of the week it is. Since each one's statement is either true or false, its a consecutive series of binary problems.
May 24, 2017
0
#6
MickinMD wrote:
Yes but these are simple A and B problems. What about A-B or B-A, or A-A or A-B. In his example B is logic and A is content.
Many complex problems, even chess ones, are most easily solved by breaking them down into a series of binary-type problems. It's true the King is in check so it's also true my only possible move is to get the King out of check. It's true moving my Q doesn't uncheck the King so it is false that my next move with be a Queen move.
It's kind of like those logic problems where the Dog tells the truth only on Mon, Wed, Fri, and Sat. and the Cat only tells the truth on Sun, Tues, Thurs, and Fri. The Dog says something and the Cat replies and from that you must elucidate which day of the week it is. Since each one's statement is either true or false, its a consecutive series of binary problems.
Binary logic is where B explains A and A explains B. Since humans are very capable of this depth of understanding, we can model a description of reality with the manifolds A and B. There is also a form of logic, where A is always correct even when B, the opposition, is also correct. This is called logical connectivism. The reason of course is that A is the relationship between A and B, but A focuses on the individual and center, but draws everything in, and B is the logic that tries to define everything in a restrictive and unempathic way. Why are A and B related? Because B is an extension of A. A is the subjective simplicity of reality, and B is the definitive and descriptive placeholder for A's consistency of being. A is subjective and B is countersubjective. But without the complexity and subjectivity of A and/or B, you can't have either. This is the basic concept of philosophy