Can you get better just by playing a lot?

Sort:
Avatar of Corbellino
I am rubbish at chess. Sub-1000 rating. I like most people am busy. I don't have a lot of time to study chess (though I do try sometimes). My question: can you get good (1600+) just by playing a lot and trial & error type learning? or do you NEED to study, find a mentor, etc.
Avatar of blueemu

Playing chess is by far the most important part of any improvement plan. Study is useful, but practice is vital.

Avatar of highsimms

it's certainly fun but with out any other resources you can only learn by reviewing your games and figuring out how you lost. there are lots of fun resources out there.

Avatar of Chicken_Monster

Carlsen said he isn't into that Russian-old-school style of tearing your finished games apart. He said he doesn't like it. I feel the same way. I know -- we aren't Carlsen.

Avatar of Chicken_Monster

what fun resources?

Avatar of Derek515

I was told once chess is like a pyrimid the more you play the better even when you lose

 

Avatar of Derek515

always play to the end if you can never submit

 

Avatar of Derek515

play for the draw or stalemate there is always something to play for.

 

Avatar of Derek515

learn the basic opening moves...  and get a book on tactics

 

Avatar of Derek515

tactics are important you need to know what a fork or skewer  or pin is to understand the game

 

Avatar of Chicken_Monster

what is the difference between a fork, skewer, and pin?

 

Avatar of Chicken_Monster

 verylate -- u equate chess with martial arts?

 

Avatar of Ziryab
No
Avatar of Ziryab
Chicken_Monster wrote:

what is the difference between a fork, skewer, and pin?

 

 

The part of this book that you can read for free via the Kindle sample will answer this question.

https://www.amazon.com/Essential-Tactics-Building-Foundation-Chess-ebook/dp/B06XKG1VZD

Avatar of highsimms
Chicken_Monster wrote:

what fun resources?

i like tactics, some sites offer free ones (chess.com gives 5 free everyday). chessable.com is pretty interesting. 100s of youtube videos. chess.com has free lessons, one a day, and drills. the endgame drills are incredibly helpful. also chess.com/tv has some educational stuff from time to time, always worth checking out.

Avatar of maathheus

I have no time for deep studing either. But I keep practicing tatics with some Apps for my smarthphone. (chess king - Tatics for beginners)

After about 200 games I was able to imrove about 150 ranting points, but I play a lot against people that have more than 1000 games and the same ranting as me, so I guess that just tons of playing don't automatically improve your chess, but playing + tatics training, leads to a good improvement.

Avatar of dfgh123

Just playing chess is active learning without the learning, so it's just active 

So no it doesn't work

Avatar of SteamGear
Corbellino wrote:
I am rubbish at chess. Sub-1000 rating. I like most people am busy. I don't have a lot of time to study chess (though I do try sometimes). My question: can you get good (1600+) just by playing a lot and trial & error type learning? or do you NEED to study, find a mentor, etc.

Sure, you can improve from just playing alone. Though the process might be slow going. It might take you anywhere from a year to a decade to reach 1600+ in that manner—as you'll be relying on your own conclusions, which may or may not be correct.

You'll improve much faster if you combine playing with studying, and reviewing.

Avatar of santiagomagno15

I went to 1500 by only playing and doing 5 tactics a day, after that I study other things and read books and now I am 1900

Avatar of allmeister

A lot of it is just practice, the more you play the better you get.