ok i see changed it to 1
Cant abort games only resign. Lost 4 games in a row beacuse of this
Sort:
Oct 7, 2024
0
#183
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
I wrote roughly. 100 rupees equaling 1.2 us dollars is hardly any better.
You know why that is, right. It's because India imports more than they export. India isn't very productive as an economy per person.
I am quoting this cuz you can edit anytime and i never wrote that
Oct 7, 2024
0
#184
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
I wrote roughly. 100 rupees equaling 1.2 us dollars is hardly any better.
You know why that is, right. It's because India imports more than they export. India isn't very productive as an economy per person.
You know whats the root of all this poverty?190 years of colonialism.They stole 5 times of their current GDP when they were in India (and other countries).
Oct 7, 2024
0
#185
I don't know what your writing about here, but you should probably contend with the fact that India has the 136th largest GDP per capita, only slightly ahead of Bangledesh which only has 171 million residents. Are you guys just lazy or what?
Oct 7, 2024
0
#186
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
I wrote roughly. 100 rupees equaling 1.2 us dollars is hardly any better.
You know why that is, right. It's because India imports more than they export. India isn't very productive as an economy per person.
You know whats the root of all this poverty?190 years of colonialism.They stole 5 times of their current GDP when they were in India (and other countries).
Maybe they shouldn't have gotten colonized if they felt so badly about it. All they had to do was develop a strong enough military presence to ward off colonial efforts. But they didn't...
Maybe because they were as lazy as they are today.
Oct 7, 2024
0
#187
As to why India is 136 th in GDP per capita is that the number of jobs in India is not able to keep pace with the increasing population . Also if you have the slightest of idea about Indian history you should know that India was one of the richest countries in the world.But repititive invasions from the Sultans,Mughals and finally the British constantly drained the wealth of India.Also partition during the time of our independence made the Indian government spend an increasing amount of money on defence alone.But now as the financial condition is slowly improving India is now investing in the fields of education,health and jobs.So there is nothing about laziness.Infact India is one of the most laborious countries in the world.Just look at the amount of efforts put in by farmers.They do almost everything manually.The industrialists,workers all have to work a lot to just subsist.
Oct 7, 2024
0
#188
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
I wrote roughly. 100 rupees equaling 1.2 us dollars is hardly any better.
You know why that is, right. It's because India imports more than they export. India isn't very productive as an economy per person.
You know whats the root of all this poverty?190 years of colonialism.They stole 5 times of their current GDP when they were in India (and other countries).
Maybe they shouldn't have gotten colonized if they felt so badly about it. All they had to do was develop a strong enough military presence to ward off colonial efforts. But they didn't...
Maybe because they were are lazy as they are today.
If you have no idea about Indian history,better avoid commenting on it.It was not our Indian soldiers and kings who were fighting.At that time India was ruled by the later Mughals and many independent rulers.And In one of our states West Bengal,there was betrayer who surrendered to the British as they had promised him to get him to the throne if he surrendered.Otherwise 10,000 britishers could never defeat an army of lakhs.
Oct 7, 2024
0
#189
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
As to why India is 136 th in GDP per capita is that the number of jobs in India is not able to keep pace with the increasing population . Also if you have the slightest of idea about Indian history you should know that India was one of the richest countries in the world.But repititive invasions from the Sultans,Mughals and finally the British constantly drained the wealth of India.Also partition during the time of our independence made the Indian government spend an increasing amount of money on defence alone.But now as the financial condition is slowly improving India is now investing in the fields of education,health and jobs.So there is nothing about laziness.Infact India is one of the most laborious countries in the world.Just look at the amount of efforts put in by farmers.They do almost everything manually.The industrialists,workers all have to work a lot to just subsist.
India is the 136th largest GDP per capita because that's what the global economic date suggests.
Learn more about your own country before you start jingoistically bragging about it.
Oct 7, 2024
0
#191
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
I wrote roughly. 100 rupees equaling 1.2 us dollars is hardly any better.
You know why that is, right. It's because India imports more than they export. India isn't very productive as an economy per person.
You know whats the root of all this poverty?190 years of colonialism.They stole 5 times of their current GDP when they were in India (and other countries).
Maybe they shouldn't have gotten colonized if they felt so badly about it. All they had to do was develop a strong enough military presence to ward off colonial efforts. But they didn't...
Maybe because they were are lazy as they are today.
If you have no idea about Indian history,better avoid commenting on it.It was not our Indian soldiers and kings who were fighting.At that time India was ruled by the later Mughals and many independent rulers.And In one of our states West Bengal,there was betrayer who surrendered to the British as they had promised him to get him to the throne if he surrendered.Otherwise 10,000 britishers could never defeat an army of lakhs.
Pure copium
Oct 7, 2024
0
#192
They were so incapable that they needed help from the french lol cant even fight for their own independence
Oct 7, 2024
0
#193
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
I wrote roughly. 100 rupees equaling 1.2 us dollars is hardly any better.
You know why that is, right. It's because India imports more than they export. India isn't very productive as an economy per person.
You know whats the root of all this poverty?190 years of colonialism.They stole 5 times of their current GDP when they were in India (and other countries).
Maybe they shouldn't have gotten colonized if they felt so badly about it. All they had to do was develop a strong enough military presence to ward off colonial efforts. But they didn't...
Maybe because they were are lazy as they are today.
If you have no idea about Indian history,better avoid commenting on it.It was not our Indian soldiers and kings who were fighting.At that time India was ruled by the later Mughals and many independent rulers.And In one of our states West Bengal,there was betrayer who surrendered to the British as they had promised him to get him to the throne if he surrendered.Otherwise 10,000 britishers could never defeat an army of lakhs.
Pure copium
oh wow now an american will teach an indian about indian history wow the betrayer i am talking about is mir jafar search is google
Oct 7, 2024
0
#194
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
They were so incapable that they needed help from the french lol cant even fight for their own independence
Lol, the US and India were colonized around the same time and India only won independence in 1947. Soo lazy
Oct 7, 2024
0
#195
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
They were so incapable that they needed help from the french lol cant even fight for their own independence
We won independence like 170 years before you did. Lol
Maybe that's why your GDP is nearly 9 times less than ours despite having 4 times our population.
Oct 7, 2024
0
#196
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
They were so incapable that they needed help from the french lol cant even fight for their own independence
We won independence like 170 years before you did. Lol
Maybe that's why your GDP is nearly 9 times less than ours despite having 4 times our population.
WITH FRENCH SUPPORT ATLEAST WE FOUGHT FOR OUR OWN INDEPENDENCE
Oct 7, 2024
0
#197
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
They were so incapable that they needed help from the french lol cant even fight for their own independence
We won independence like 170 years before you did. Lol
Maybe that's why your GDP is nearly 9 times less than ours despite having 4 times our population.
WITH FRENCH SUPPORT ATLEAST WE FOUGHT FOR OUR OWN INDEPENDENCE
Lol, you should have built ally support. Working harder, not smarter.
Guess that's just how Indians do it.
More than half the world was busy fighting for their own independence
Oct 7, 2024
0
#198
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
punchdrunkpatzer wrote:
ChessIsAGoodBoardGame wrote:
They were so incapable that they needed help from the french lol cant even fight for their own independence
We won independence like 170 years before you did. Lol
Maybe that's why your GDP is nearly 9 times less than ours despite having 4 times our population.
WITH FRENCH SUPPORT ATLEAST WE FOUGHT FOR OUR OWN INDEPENDENCE
Lol, you should have built ally support. Working harder, not smarter.
Guess that's just how Indians do it.
More than half the world was busy fighting for their own independence
Look, I don't know world history—or American history— for that matter. At this point, I'm just looking up facts on Google and trolling you with them because it's entertaining. I'm not really interested in this argument anymore.
I don't think any lesser of Indians than I do anyone else. I've just noticed more misbehavior from them on chess.com than from other nationalities.
there are fake flgs unow
#1 considering your rating,seems like your brain also aborts before games
1448 games og du er 1100 rated du må jo være en amøbe.
1100 rated chess is way beyond your level.And look at his daily chess rating 1700! And most rapid games he plays unrated hence he is still 1184.You should first look at yourself before commenting to others.And btw he was just stating a fact.You cant call him an amoeba for stating a fact.
Daily rating is more meaningless than puzzles. Cheating is permitted in daily, so anyone can get any rating.
I genuinly think RDkhanna and ChessIsABoardGame are being paid by the Indian state at this point lols
believe me
i have enoughmoney to not need bribes
i think u r being a sore lsr u r
besidesi am underaged u know nbody will ever give me money till i am over age
unlike u i care for my country honour while u r busy lessening urs
You told me in DMs u were underage mate.... "i have enoughmoney to not need bribes"
So what, he is underage?
He can say anything he likes! He just doesn't want to use discord, so what?
WE ALL KNOW DUDE!
YOU WILL COME TO DISCORD, SAY THE WORST TYPES OF BAD WORDS AND PUT BAD THINGS INTO HIS MIND, BECAUSE DISCORD DOESN'T HAVE MODS THAT DO STUFF LIKE CHESS.COM MODS!!!
I have been using DISCORD FOR A LONG TIME, I KNOW IT BETTER DUDE
Do you lack basic reading comprehension, or just general critical thinking? Let me explain for you so you might understand. It is real simple. He said he cant be bribed beacuse he has money and I pointed out he was underage so thats a very weird claim to make. Got it? Thanks
My little bro is 10 y/o and has 1000 rupees
my little sis is 12 y/o and has 2500 rupees
Both are underaged according to Discord, but have money
Some people win money via tournaments and lotteries too while being less than 13 y/o, what's your point?
Are you pointing out, your family is poor and thus you have never experienced it?
INDIA IS A FAMILY, DON'T EVER DARE DISRESPECT US, OR NEXT TIME, WE ARE WAGING A BIGGER WAR!
Lol, you're soo cringe. Isn't 2500 rupees like 20 dollars.
Ig work on you maths skills maybe? 2500 ÷80 is somewhere 30 31 dollars not 20.
Lol no one cares about the actual conversion rates of your worthless currency. If you were fluent in English, you'd understand the point. Whether 20 dollars or 30, this is an absurdly small sum of money he's using to call someone poor. This isn't enough money to buy even half a tank of gas nearly anywhere in the world.
You're lucky I care enough about India to even be able to ballpark how much money that is. Most people couldn't care less about your country.
You are not important person that everyone would care about whether you care about India.And the currency is not worthless.India has the 4th largest GDP.
India is actually the 5th largest GDP and is the most populous country on earth. When accounting for its massive population, India is actually the 136th largest GDP per capita. That means one person from the US is 136X as productive in the economy as the average Indian.
But good try, my man.
By the way, I looked up the actual conversion rates and 100 rupees is roughly equal to 1 US dollars. Real bad look
you said 0.9 dollars not 1.2 dollars