Carlsen only wishes.........

Sort:
jhatchuel

At least Carlsen doesn't say "brah" at the end of every sentence... Unless it's a psychological trick on your part to seem ridiculous/annoy your oponent, in which case it's very effective.

letsgohome
jhatchuel wrote:

At least Carlsen doesn't say "brah" at the end of every sentence... Unless it's a psychological trick on your part to seem ridiculous/annoy your oponent, in which case it's very effective.

Thannk you Jhatchuel, can you please give me some advice on how to be get better. Thanks in advance 

BMeck
letsgohome wrote:
BMeck wrote:

Lets play unrated

You are too weak of a player brah. I'm sorry thats just the facts brah. And you still have not answered the questions.

I am uncapable of answering... prove that I am too weak. 

letsgohome

Admission is the first step brah. I am so proud of you, but keep on trying to ameliorate your life brah.  

letsgohome

in laymen terms, for you understand your weakness, now do something about it.

BMeck

lets play brah

jhatchuel

OK number 1 advice, stop acting like a fraternity house bro when you probably didn't even make it to college.

catenaccio11
letsgohome wrote:

.....that he could only be as good as I am in his first year of playing. On a relative basis, I have indeed a better understanding than Carlsen could even have imagined in his first year of playing chess. I have transcended all of his goals and abilities given the same measurement of time, being our first year, which is the only impartial determinant and justly comparable. In my first year of play i have ascertained a live standard rating of 1445, which is in the 91st percentile, without reading/studying chess books or analyzing any games (my own or masters). To those of you who think i am lying based on my game archive than you are only reaffirming my position of how much better I am than Carlsen. Also, I have a blitz rating of 1244, a chess960 of 1428 and a tactical trainer of over 1500. I have also nearly beaten a master in my short career. Therefore, if one extrapolates my first year success the ONLY logical conclusion is that I will unequivocally become a grandmaster and inevitably be the World Champion all within my first 3 years of playing. i am not trying to come off cocky, but I am stating facts that i am indeed better than Carlsen was in his first year, that is all.

i like that line of thought. i started walking as a baby when i was 7 months old. that is very early, certainly in the top 1%. usain bolt startet when he was 12 months old. 

thus i will outrun usain bolt, probably when i turn 64. i'm already excited to see that happen.

letsgohome
jhatchuel wrote:

OK number 1 advice, stop acting like a fraternity house bro when you probably didn't even make it to college.

What is college brah?

letsgohome
catenaccio11 wrote:
letsgohome wrote:

.....that he could only be as good as I am in his first year of playing. On a relative basis, I have indeed a better understanding than Carlsen could even have imagined in his first year of playing chess. I have transcended all of his goals and abilities given the same measurement of time, being our first year, which is the only impartial determinant and justly comparable. In my first year of play i have ascertained a live standard rating of 1445, which is in the 91st percentile, without reading/studying chess books or analyzing any games (my own or masters). To those of you who think i am lying based on my game archive than you are only reaffirming my position of how much better I am than Carlsen. Also, I have a blitz rating of 1244, a chess960 of 1428 and a tactical trainer of over 1500. I have also nearly beaten a master in my short career. Therefore, if one extrapolates my first year success the ONLY logical conclusion is that I will unequivocally become a grandmaster and inevitably be the World Champion all within my first 3 years of playing. i am not trying to come off cocky, but I am stating facts that i am indeed better than Carlsen was in his first year, that is all.

i like that line of thought. i started walking as a baby when i was 7 months old. that is very early, certainly in the top 1%. usain bolt startet when he was 12 months old. 

thus i will outrun usain bolt, probably when i turn 64. i'm already excited to see that happen.

How did you know you walked at 7 months? Your parents could have been trying to boost your self esteem. Also, if you can "see" it then it will happen. Also, your analogy fails because I am me and you are you.That is all. After a laugh. LOL

BMeck

lets play

letsgohome
BMeck wrote:

lets play

I will entertain this proposal ONLY if you answer my two questions on post 144

BadHabitZZZ

Basta con le droge

letsgohome
BadHabitZZZ wrote:

Basta con le droge

Thank you Badhibtzzz with your response. It is much appreciated.

catenaccio11

How did you know you walked at 7 months? Your parents could have been trying to boost your self esteem. Also, if you can "see" it then it will happen. Also, your analogy fails because I am me and you are you.That is all. After a laugh. LOL

your mother has been trying to boost your self-esteem and see where it got you. the analogy does fail obv, because you are a boring chess player and i am an athlete. so long, brah, i'm going out now to have some sex and i suggest you do the same.

KvothDuval
catenaccio11 wrote:

How did you know you walked at 7 months? Your parents could have been trying to boost your self esteem. Also, if you can "see" it then it will happen. Also, your analogy fails because I am me and you are you.That is all. After a laugh. LOL

your mother has been trying to boost your self-esteem and see where it got you. the analogy does fail obv, because you are a boring chess player and i am an athlete. so long, brah, i'm going out now to have some sex and i suggest you do the same.

lol...

BMeck
letsgohome wrote:
BMeck wrote:

lets play

I will entertain this proposal ONLY if you answer my two questions on post 144

The lowest was 1297 and the highest was over 1400 I believe

letsgohome
catenaccio11 wrote:

How did you know you walked at 7 months? Your parents could have been trying to boost your self esteem. Also, if you can "see" it then it will happen. Also, your analogy fails because I am me and you are you.That is all. After a laugh. LOL

your mother has been trying to boost your self-esteem and see where it got you. the analogy does fail obv, because you are a boring chess player and i am an athlete. so long, brah, i'm going out now to have some sex and i suggest you do the same.

LMAO. So being an athlete and having sex makes you cool, brah? That means most of the world is cool. Thank you, so being the best human being is to have sex and be an athlete. Mr. President we have just received word on a chess.com by a member called cateneccio that we should stop everything we are doing and just focus on sex and being an athelete as this will surely rid the world of all its problem. For the ascendancy of man is ONLY to have sex and be an athlete, this is the most profound statement in of all mankind's short histroy. And in this world of withheld permission may you be cooler than nearly everybody in the wolrd population that has had sex and is/has an athlete.That is all after I lugh. LMAO

letsgohome
BMeck wrote:
letsgohome wrote:
BMeck wrote:

lets play

I will entertain this proposal ONLY if you answer my two questions on post 144

The lowest was 1297 and the highest was over 1400 I believe

I need to see some rough work. At least give a breakdown of my rating and their rating and come to an average brah.

Chessislife2013
letsgohome wrote:

.....that he could only be as good as I am in his first year of playing. On a relative basis, I have indeed a better understanding than Carlsen could even have imagined in his first year of playing chess. I have transcended all of his goals and abilities given the same measurement of time, being our first year, which is the only impartial determinant and justly comparable. In my first year of play i have ascertained a live standard rating of 1445, which is in the 91st percentile, without reading/studying chess books or analyzing any games (my own or masters). To those of you who think i am lying based on my game archive than you are only reaffirming my position of how much better I am than Carlsen. Also, I have a blitz rating of 1244, a chess960 of 1428 and a tactical trainer of over 1500. I have also nearly beaten a master in my short career. Therefore, if one extrapolates my first year success the ONLY logical conclusion is that I will unequivocally become a grandmaster and inevitably be the World Champion all within my first 3 years of playing. i am not trying to come off cocky, but I am stating facts that i am indeed better than Carlsen was in his first year, that is all.

Was my first year of chess better than nearly all chess players, including most GMs? Yes. http://www.uschess.org/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,181/  Please look at the tournament history, I won my first tournament with 5.0/5! I learned at 4, but I didn't play more than 100 games total, let alone any training until Summer of last year. And that first tournament, the second year I participated I was the strongest play in all the divisions! I was second, but I beat the person with first regularly (we're friends). Not to mention, check out my Chess.com stats.

Am I comparing myself to Carlsen?? NO.