cheater_1 vs. chess.com

Sort:
dalmatinac
funny
Rabid_Dog
Just what I always thought about Cheater_1 but couldn't be bothered to put into print. (I have a life).  Cheater_1 starts these posts because he is all on his own with his toys.  In the UK we would call him BillyNoMates.  It could be a good title for the game.
Checkers4Me

So, people are willing to cheat just to beat Cheater_1?

Am I follwing this correctly?

 

I really think Cheater_1 has more smarts than some give him credit for. 


tderifield
Checkers4Me wrote:

So, people are willing to cheat just to beat Cheater_1?

Am I follwing this correctly?

 

I really think Cheater_1 has more smarts than some give him credit for. 


 Obviously, cheater_1 and checkers4me are one and the same!  But, really...it seems like you are right, checkers4me.  Then again, as previously stipulated, my B.R.A.I.N. system is slower than most.


hondoham
cheater_1 wrote:

I can HEAR the people turning into cheaters right now. I can sense the people dusting off Chessmaster 4000.


i'm too busy polishing the vacuum tubes and cataloging my punchcards.


Checkers4Me
tderifield wrote: Checkers4Me wrote:

So, people are willing to cheat just to beat Cheater_1?

Am I follwing this correctly?

 

I really think Cheater_1 has more smarts than some give him credit for. 


 Obviously, cheater_1 and checkers4me are one and the same!  But, really...it seems like you are right, checkers4me.  Then again, as previously stipulated, my B.R.A.I.N. system is slower than most.


Believe me, I am not nearly creative enough to come up with cheater_1 as an alter ego.

Your B.R.A.I.N. versus cheater_1 makes much more sense.

It just seems that cheating to beater cheater_1 would just play into his hands.


God2
one day,there will be God2 vs chess.com...
fadingfog

I'd rather practice playing my bass than engage cheater_1.....in the grand scheme of things, engaging cheater_1 is a great waste of time and there are better things to be doing to improve our lives or that of others in a world where our climate is falling to sh*t and maybe someday our children wont have a world to live in.

 Ok, now for something completly different and better..... Tongue out


Niven42
Dmytro wrote: Don't pay attention to this cheater. He simply want to annoy us.

He apparently doesn't have a rating or a game history.  Is he just trolling?


tderifield
Dmytro wrote: Don't pay attention to this cheater. He simply want to annoy us.

If that's what he wants, he is not succeeding.  So far, I find his posts (with their bravado and UNEXPLAINED use OF caps) absolutely hilarious!  

    @Niven42: Go Purdue!  I think there was a forum last week where he strangely admitted to being a paid troll or something close to that.  Now this week it's cheater_1 v. the world.  So I don't know.  


Tom
maybe we should set a limit on ratings to play, like no one under 1600 can participate in this particular game, just so we dont have the majority voting bad moves, because the majority of players are around 1300; no offense you guys who are lower rated, we just want to hand this guy his butt on a plate
chessfanforlife
w00t!
cheater_1
By the way, I HAVE A SPAMMING program JUST ITCHING to submit pure CRAPOLA moves. HERR ERIK has already turned to the dark side and will be CHEATING (YES YOU HEARD RIGHT) Senior ERIK will be cheating just to beat me. I have upped the ante and will be FLOODING the votes with losing moves. Mr. Erik took the gloves off, well, I one upped him. I put on the brass knuckles. Don't push me people. I faint at the sight of blood.
Rael

Are you scared of what it will mean if you lose, cheater?

 

I kindof am. Brings the whole thing to a head. And if you get beaten, it kindof takes a lot of the oumph out of your character, eh? Ah well, you had a good run.

 

I think we'd notice the spam thing though... cause we can see the total list of players, so if there were more votes than players it would be obvious.

 


erik
you said you were unmateable. i thought this is what you wanted. you want us to play against your computer but we can't use ours??
RedSoxpawn
sounds like some bull$h!t to me, just like when one high school team claims to have the refs paid, and yet the other team actually does, example Erik heads the site, and cheater is claiming that he is abusing the site.
dalmatinac
Cheater_1 you wanted it and you got it.Where is the problem now asshole?!!
cheater_1
No no no you have a point ERIK. But here's how Im looking at it. Everyone is so AGAINST cheating, so condemning, so quick to CRUCIFY, but when the time is right, everyone seems to open up their closet and have a RYBKA raring to go on a dual processor PENTIUM 10 with 12 terrabytes or RAM and seemingly sinks right into the cheating methodology without thinking about it. Kinda smacks of hypocrasy to me. So be it fellow cheaters.
cheater_1
You all are sinking to my level. I'm not happy about it. Save yourselves. Once you get bit by the POWER of the cheating bug, it's hard to shake.
Thompson

If both sides are using computers they cannot both be cheating. This is just a simple game of advanced chess and it might just be the first fair game you have played in years.

 

cheater_1 is upset because he can't cheat, well done Erik.