Checking if Elo system is oppressive [With proofs]

I proved that this wackadoodle is real.

sure sure, you're right, so what? Now get on your way before the mods break this down.

By extension you're wackadoodle then.

I think the main issue you have here is that what you are measuring is the elo of bots not humans. They are radically different. Bots are extremely inconsistent, particularly at lower levels of play.

That's not the main issue, main issue is pool isolation, lack of pool-joining actions (special matching and rating recalculation).

Bots are not "extremely" inconsistent. If something is inconsistent in chess that has to be the human play (especially at lower levels), not bot play. Bot have precise FIDE Elo.

Bots are inconsistent compared to human play

Actually consistency needs to involve some weird variables having a little bit of inconsistency is normal

Janko's added me to his "chrome plugin" so now I'm here to argue with basketstorm

The only pool division I see is a secondary rating floor barely possible to fall under

Get out, we're arguing with basketstorm here, not you.

Honestly basketstorm is probably a alt janko account. They're all trolls tho

I'm not too sure, they have different stories and explanations

I thought you blur TitanMaster's messages?

It's me who blur his messages. Another proof that we are different person.

Uh no, Janko said he blurred my messages too

Janko, i don't care if you say it is photoshopped, your statement is basically useless, since you say that to EVERYTHING and EVERYONE. Basketstorm, are you going to say that this is photoshopped too? Or do you prefer to stay silent and admit you're wrong

Yeah sure, and why should you turn it off? What, want to make your forum popular again? But my point is still proven, Janko and basketstorm both blur my messages

Whoops, Janko deleted his quote lol

I know that the first image was just a topic starter, but, that first image looks suspiciously like part of the curve Y = 2/X

and this curve shows the probabilities of an item with a 50/50 chance of moving left or right ending up at a certain X, so it's suspicious that the graph can be matched up with part of the chart, as that would mean that if the graph were bigger it may very well match the curve, which would mean that the graph is very suspicious.