I have just allowed chess.com to analyse a few of my games. My rating on this is 800 ish so some judgement moves aren't always the best. However, the analysis showed the "Best" moves as better than mine. In most instances the"Best" move led to worse positions. My positions became over exposed, open and vulnerable to pressure attacks. My moves, though not maybe accurate, enabled other ideas that I could comfortably play out. eg, blocking my opponent or forcing a choice on my opponent maybe resulting in a mistake.etc. Analysis at my level is too severe or even too subtle.
Best moves are best from an engine standpoint. Those will not always be best from a practical standpoint for a player of a given rating.
For most players, looking at blunders and mistakes are going to provide the best value.
I have just allowed chess.com to analyse a few of my games. My rating on this is 800 ish so some judgement moves aren't always the best. However, the analysis showed the "Best" moves as better than mine. In most instances the"Best" move led to worse positions. My positions became over exposed, open and vulnerable to pressure attacks. My moves, though not maybe accurate, enabled other ideas that I could comfortably play out. eg, blocking my opponent or forcing a choice on my opponent maybe resulting in a mistake.etc. Analysis at my level is too severe or even too subtle.