Chess is an anti-intellectual game.

Sort:
Avatar of StockfishVersion2023

Chess requires no analysis and no thought. It's a simple pattern game that a zero intellect gnat could play perfectly. Arriving at this conclusion has nothing to do with intellect and everything to do with rejecting the false gods of this world, the falseness of the world is what blinds everyone to every truth.

Avatar of lemaudit1

Quasi-philosophical ramblings and counterfeit religioso ranting...

Avatar of Cyrus096

None of this is true and none of it belongs here

Avatar of MiguelUAB

No

Avatar of StockfishVersion2023

Your quasi-philosophical lameness is indicative of the rote stupidity induced in your brain by the imbecility that is chess. You are a zero intellect player in a zero intellect game of life playing a zero intellect game of chess.

Avatar of magipi
StockfishVersion2023 wrote:

Arriving at this conclusion has nothing to do with intellect

I think we can all agree with that.

Avatar of BlissieBearrie

Hello, StockfishVersion2023 happy
My close friend and relative has a high I.Q. She is 1/2 a century years old and throughout all those years, all the I.Q. tests she has taken, she's come up on the top amongst everybody else (if not first place (No. 1) then No. 2 or No. 3 -- on all the tests she's taken (within 50 years -- and that's very many).
She's been a member here on Chess.com for over six (6) years and has played many games; YET her ratings are low! Her low ratings are not a reflection of a low intellect because, as mentioned in my first paragraph above, all her I.Q. tests show otherwise.
I would put it this way. Chess is a structured game (meaning: the pieces can only move certain ways) -- luck is possible with your opponent because the average human being cannot see what moves your opponent will make many moves in advance. And there are literally hundreds of different setups that can happen in Chess.
A grandmaster once was shocked when his opponent won the game (thinking he did not have the intellect and skill to do so).

Avatar of jofchess

You need fast parallel counting abilities, if you can count up to 5, you can play chess not so bad, of course you can learn much book/best moves, tactical patterns or even whole games with strategies (i.e. remembering counts of threats and attacks in specific positions and many moves in advance). So chess is intellectual as a game, but restricted to this very specific counting and remembering abilities.

Avatar of CraigIreland
StockfishVersion2023 wrote:

Chess requires no analysis and no thought. It's a simple pattern game that a zero intellect gnat could play perfectly. Arriving at this conclusion has nothing to do with intellect and everything to do with rejecting the false gods of this world, the falseness of the world is what blinds everyone to every truth.

I can't decide if this is a troll post or indicative of psychosis. If you're not trolling then I urge you to talk to your healthcare provider about your belief that the world is false. You're likely to mistrust what I'm saying but the world is our shared reality and when your mind isn't grounded in the shared reality there is a very good chance that you can become much happier and safer, with the appropriate care.

Avatar of Never2late2resign
We can settle this dispute. We keep playing chess whether it's intellectual or nor. StockfishVersion2023 rejects all false gods. And we all go for 100% accuracy. StockfishVersion2023 has a great advantage of finishing first. In just a minute. Case closed.
Avatar of Reprka
BlissieBearrie wrote:

Hello, StockfishVersion2023 
My close friend and relative has a high I.Q. She is 1/2 a century years old and throughout all those years, all the I.Q. tests she has taken, she's come up on the top amongst everybody else (if not first place (No. 1) then No. 2 or No. 3 -- on all the tests she's taken (within 50 years -- and that's very many).
She's been a member here on Chess.com for over six (6) years and has played many games; YET her ratings are low! Her low ratings are not a reflection of a low intellect because, as mentioned in my first paragraph above, all her I.Q. tests show otherwise.
I would put it this way. Chess is a structured game (meaning: the pieces can only move certain ways) -- luck is possible with your opponent because the average human being cannot see what moves your opponent will make many moves in advance. And there are literally hundreds of different setups that can happen in Chess.
A grandmaster once was shocked when his opponent won the game (thinking he did not have the intellect and skill to do so).

Nope. A high IQ doesn't mean you are a good chess player all the time.

Avatar of Cyrus096

There have been multiple studies that have shown that IQ has no relation to chess playing ability. Also this whole thread is probably the dumbest rage quit I've ever seen

Avatar of catorno

Someone's been losing a lot.

Avatar of 654Psyfox

I say it's a solved game. But requires time management.

Avatar of TuffgangAmadeusMozart

If you think it's that big of a deal just silently quit.

Avatar of TuffgangAmadeusMozart

Also, chess is as intellectual as the effort and brainpower you put behind your moves. So maybe in your case, you're right. Chess is (for you) not an intellectual game. However, for those of us who actually try, and think before we move it is a very intellectually stimulating game.

Avatar of Laskersnephew
The OP sure has a wordy way of telling us that he’s lousy at chess
Avatar of lemaudit1
StockfishVersion2023 wrote:

Your quasi-philosophical lameness is indicative of the rote stupidity induced in your brain by the imbecility that is chess. You are a zero intellect player in a zero intellect game of life playing a zero intellect game of chess.

Well, YOU are a zero intellect PERSON,Deleted mod KS

Avatar of One_Zeroth

anti-intellectual SPORT

Avatar of TuffgangAmadeusMozart

Here's the only spin of this statement you assert that makes it true. The word "anti" can mean against. In chess you are playing against people, and people who play chess are considered intellectuals. So you are playing against intellectuals, or in other words you are being anti-intellectual.