Oh, and again, I'll make a request if you want to ignore most of my analysis :p
I also request you read the notes to move 11. Those french lines can give you some attacking ideas.
Also this
Chess is so freagin hard.
Sort:
@godsofhell thank you very much for your insight and analysis, I will read them again and again and let them saturate more. Yes I horribly evaluated the endgame, with his knight on f6 and my strong control of b1/h7 diagonal, and his knights responsibility defending h7 I felt much better, but suddenly a few moves later he has f5 in, his N is on c5 and everything is coordinated perfectly and all of his static weaknesses are somehow not weaknesses (h7,g6,f7,b6 and my control over b5). it is still hard to believe he can have so many weak squares especially light squares around his king, yet he is not tied down to passive defense whatsoever
I thank you for trying to help but I am not interested in learning the ideas of openings that are allowed to piss on logic and general principles because they simply have not been proven as garbage yet in a concrete way.
I often feel that way about the sicilian. Black gets way behind in development, but white can't open lines so he gets away with it.