kraminik could easily have been bart simpson though as i copied his answers
Chess Personality Test
Sort:
Rkane275 wrote:
kraminik could easily have been bart simpson though as i copied his answers
I don't follow.
Feb 9, 2015
0
#44
I posted the pic so that the "scale" will also be shown. It's my 3rd time that I took that test. 1st time I also got that Assassin title and then 2nd time Kramnik although I can't recall it accurately. 3rd is Assassin again. I admit grinder sounds interesting and I really like Karpov's style. Oh well I'm happy with my result since I pretty much choose "assassin" types of characters in games I play.
Feb 9, 2015
0
#45
chicken look bart plays chess or better yet reread ie i copied bart not the brightest bulb answers
Feb 9, 2015
0
#46
@XPLAYERJX - No no I was not discouraged. I just mentioned it cause I thought it was a little weird that I posted the whole pic. Hehe. The recommended openings there was actually the one I played the most :D. Nice explanation and tips by the way. And yeah I also experience your case of 10-0 and then 0-10 sometimes.
Chicken_Monster wrote:
LightYearz wrote:
Fairly accurate too because in real life I ALWAYS PLAY IT SAFE, Unless it the risks I take are win/win (SAFE Risks. lol.)
But is says Kasparov is calm and unemotional. You are SCREAMING IN CAPS!
They were highlighted as a guideline to understand what I do.
Also
A test is not always right haha.
I am very emotional, emotions set humans apart from Robots.
Love conquers all.
Some simple math if you get what I mean :P
I am a Magician.
Incohatus wrote:
I posted the pic so that the "scale" will also be shown. It's my 3rd time that I took that test. 1st time I also got that Assassin title and then 2nd time Kramnik although I can't recall it accurately. 3rd is Assassin again. I admit grinder sounds interesting and I really like Karpov's style. Oh well I'm happy with my result since I pretty much choose "assassin" types of characters in games I play.
Your logic is unassailable. ;)
Tal could be drunk and beat me, so don't feel bad.
Karpov! Yeah!!! Lol
Feb 10, 2015
0
#55
Prodigy....but I don't play many of the reccomended openings.
Feb 10, 2015
0
#56
Chicken_Monster wrote:
Kasparov. Not bad.
It tells you which openings you should use for Kasparov or whatever player you are like.
Is Carlsen an option I wonder? No one got Magnus? Anand?
Anand is natural, and Carlsen is Progidy.
Feb 10, 2015
0
#57
The Prodigy is the ultimate sportsman. Prodigies play aggressively and fight for the win from the beginning to the end, but place the highest value on maintaining emotional control and utilizing every opportunity that comes their way. Prodigies are not out to prove any kinds of theories, or to create great works of art (though that often happens anyway); for Prodigies winning is everything… because winning is simply more fun.
Magnus Carlsen is a Prodigy
Magnus Carlsen (born 1990) of Norway, the current world champion, exemplifies the Prodigy. A universal player with an intuitive grasp of chess, much of Carlsen's success can be explained by his psychology which is completely unencumbered by fear. He rarely makes any kind of blunders, and plays on forever to try to win positions with the smallest advantage, or even equal ones. His endgame play is superb, and his constant pressing in every position eventually drives his opponents to make errors. Carlsen is currently the highest rated player in history.
AttackingPositional
AggressiveSolid
IntuitiveCalculating
EmotionalCalm
Recommended Openings
- White: Ruy Lopez (Spanish); Queen's Gambit
- Black: Ruy Lopez (Spanish); Sicilian Defense;Grunfeld
Yeah. We have seen your game threads and are petrified LOL.
just teasing.
So I like QG and think I will Caro. I want to be like Karpov, but throw in some gambits and aggressiveness and attacking at times. Look how passive he is. I don't think that is you, XPLAYA. You have more aggressiveness and more intuition. Not saying you shouldn't make those openings part of your repertoire...you should and are...
I thought the Caro had a reputation as being really good for a GM who needs a draw with Black instead of going for the win. I was probably misinformed then. There are probably many ways to play it.
I don't buy that he was that low on "intuitive."
I don't care. I'm using whatever openings I feel like.