Quite complex research you've got. Mind blowing work you've done.
It's easy to do research when the computer does the work . I wrote a scientific paper, that's how I learned to do research with computers .
When I play often manage to see a checkmate in five moves in half a minute , but I often fail to see that I'm losing a piece in one move in half a minute .
Even though the king has infinite value, it still has less mobility than queens, rooks or bishops. What do you think the king's value could be?
1,5 pawn , if King is active in the endgame as one piece more it is enough to bring victory .
How Anatoly Karpov was win with aktive King in endgame
here's my contribution to the discussion:
a promoted pawn is worth +8 since you do in fact trade in that pawn for the new queen you get. 🥷
here's my contribution to the discussion:
a promoted pawn is worth +8 since you do in fact trade in that pawn for the new queen you get. 🥷
because that I wrote " medium endgame calculus " at post #76 , medium is when pawns is on fourth and fifth row , but I certainly respect your experience because you have about 300 rating points more than me
Can you win endgame with King and two knights versus King and pawn maximum in 100 moves ( post #79 ) ? Stockfish 17 at depth 58 finds win in 37 moves ( post #79 )
In the video at the link Engine tournament from opening King's fianchetto with black piece s
it can be seen that the Raubfisch X48e engine default setting have a more losing game in the tournament than the Raubfisch X48e engine with changed piece values among other things
How about a queen vs two rooks?
an opening in which some engines play the variant of two rook against a queen
Even though the king has infinite value, it still has less mobility than queens, rooks or bishops. What do you think the king's value could be?