Wow, 130+ pages of muted posts...surely that can't only be Optimissed yet again? Are we missing anyone else?
Chess will never be solved, here's why
Sort:
Jun 12, 2024
0
#9043
playerafar wrote:
There's a lot of talk about ChatGPT these days.
Many sources insist that ChatGPT is an app or tool ... and yes it obviously is.
but there is a ChatGPT website too.
Just now I saw this:
"ChatGPT can’t access the internet [snip]
Correct, but it is not difficult to add an interface so it can. You don't need to do this yourself, there are multiple tools that do it. The most popular is surely the GPT-4 enhanced version of Bing
Ask it questions and it will give answers with a short list of (hopefully) reputable sources it has used. Eg, for a trivial example:
AI's in its very-VERY beginnings. and quant analysis is gonna be a dooperwowie. utilities. energy. medicine. just name it. IT. banking. me dn here at the bottom ?...i wont see it as much as how its gonna change those at the top. zinga yee !...imo. its gonna zolt efficiency like no one ever thought. bot like kismets gonna look sooo dum if u compare it today w/ tomorrow lol.
cant wait !!
Hi LUKEY !!...may ur never-ever run outta catnip lol !
DiogenesDue wrote:
Wow, 130+ pages of muted posts...surely that can't only be Optimissed yet again? Are we missing anyone else?
Yup it is optimissdd lol
MEGACHE3SE wrote:
i think optimissed got muted again LOL
Now we can make progress
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
MEGACHE3SE wrote:
i think optimissed got muted again LOL
Yeah, he wins the debates everytime.
the only defense his opponents have is to get him muted on a technicality.
no surprise to see the thread now get bombarded with badly thought through “refutations” of his axioms.
He's not even right though usually he's wrong
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
MEGACHE3SE wrote:
i think optimissed got muted again LOL
Yeah, he wins the debates everytime.
the only defense his opponents have is to get him muted on a technicality.
no surprise to see the thread now get bombarded with badly thought through “refutations” of his axioms.
Try again. How exactly do you think that his opponents "get him muted"? It's his own behavior.
Calling anything Optimissed has ever posted an axiom is being far too generous. Rather, he is often very "anti-axiomatic", preferring his own opinion (while eschewing any research) over established consensus or truths. Don't be a sucker and believe him just because he unilaterally claims he is smart/correct. Read his posts over time and realize that there's nothing really in them, just talking in circles and putting people down to raise himself up.
You like Lola...stick with her, she is somewhat smarter, and not silly enough to wade neck-deep into things she has no expertise in. She's a drive-by shooter.
DiogenesDue wrote:
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
MEGACHE3SE wrote:
i think optimissed got muted again LOL
Yeah, he wins the debates everytime.
the only defense his opponents have is to get him muted on a technicality.
no surprise to see the thread now get bombarded with badly thought through “refutations” of his axioms.
Try again. How exactly do you think that his opponents "get him muted"? It's his own behavior.
Calling anything Optimissed has ever posted an axiom is being far too generous. Rather, he is often very "anti-axiomatic", preferring his own opinion (while eschewing any research) over established consensus or truths.
I wonder if it is permanent this time he's slowly racking up too many mutes
Jun 12, 2024
0
#9052
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
MEGACHE3SE wrote:
i think optimissed got muted again LOL
Yeah, he wins the debates everytime.
the only defense his opponents have is to get him muted on a technicality.
no surprise to see the thread now get bombarded with badly thought through “refutations” of his axioms.
Idk bro optimissed gets a lot of basic definitions wrong, and I certainly dont even bother reporting his messages.
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
ah lads, c’mon.
Optimissed is like a one-man slaughterhouse on the forums.
Slaughterhouse meet invincible steak
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
ah lads, c’mon.
Optimissed is like a one-man slaughterhouse on the forums.
C'mon yourself, Tuna. You're just potstirring. You love conflict and you prop up whichever side promises to provide more drama. You've been doing it for years and years...in fact, I believe it was you who once called me the Bruce Lee of the forums...
Not a new tactic.
Jun 12, 2024
0
#9055
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
ah lads, c’mon.
Optimissed is like a one-man slaughterhouse on the forums.
u know i think luke is trolling and we all fell for it LOL
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
MEGACHE3SE wrote:
i think optimissed got muted again LOL
Yeah, he wins the debates everytime.
the only defense his opponents have is to get him muted on a technicality.
no surprise to see the thread now get bombarded with badly thought through “refutations” of his axioms.
...sooo true Lukey. and he's notta troll.
Jun 12, 2024
0
#9057
Luke-Jaywalker wrote:
MEGACHE3SE wrote:
i think optimissed got muted again LOL
Yeah, he wins the debates everytime.
the only defense his opponents have is to get him muted on a technicality.
no surprise to see the thread now get bombarded with badly thought through “refutations” of his axioms.
Actually - optimissed loses almost every time.
And he gets himself muted by his intense trolling.
Yes there will be those who want to blame others for O's trolling.
On this latest mute he'll probably again try to claim it was the robo-censor.
His previous mute a few days ago - lasted six days.
Robo mutes are 24 hours. (unless that's changed. Unlikely)
Possibility - he's deliberately got himself robo-muted this time around so he can claim he committed 'no real offenses? Very possible.
To him - his tactics and trolling are everything.
He's 'life-invested'.
Regarding his projections and projecting of his projecting ...
what's the key? Dishonesty.
O lied again and claimed he was the only one discussing the forum subject.
Others didn't. Didn't lie. (one exception)
Falsehood. A key ingredient of projection.
opti's a pleasant wait a sec. its not his fault he cant be taken. so what if hes a chalkboard handful. hes 250 watts a in ur face...and i luvem for it !
somebody fire me !
Jun 12, 2024
0
#9059
It is impressive how often Opt gets muted. He must be getting very familiar to the chess.com staff.
Jun 12, 2024
0
#9060
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:
opti's a pleasant wait a sec. its not his fault he cant be taken. so what if hes a chalkboard handful. hes 250 watts a in ur face...and i luvem for it !
Opti isn't even one watt.
No power.
While its often a mistake to want somebody muted -
that doesn't mean its not good when it happens.
---------------------------
The forum subject.
Its tygxc - not O - its tygxc who provides the 'foils of illogic' of this discussion.
And O is intensely jealous of that. Foolishly.
tygxc does his thing - with little or no personalization from him.
Yes tygxc's illogic is crass. Gross. Sustained.
And dissected by others. Analyzed. Year in year out.
But tygxc holds himself up. While O fails to do so. Year in year out.
The contrast is Stark.
optimissed: makes a faulty argument and makes false claims about mathematics due to his lack of mathematical understanding (ex: he doesnt know what a mathematical object is)
me: points out his fallacies and how he's wrong
optimissed: you just dont understand what im talking about.
any substance you had is gone. im back to ignoring you until you have an actual argument
Don't hold your breath.