Chess with no increment is unplayable

Sort:
SlantedLight

You have a rook, bishop and 2 pawns vs king and rook and lose because it takes more than 30 seconds to convert. It's fake chess, and any time control without increment should be banned (even in casual play).

 

Disgusting: https://www.chess.com/game/live/24097107735

x-3232926362

What is it with this compulsive desire to force other people to do or not to do what you like or dislike? (Recurring theme on these forums). Why ban time controls without increment? You do not have to play them. Let other people decide for themselves.

SlantedLight

You do not have to play them

 

Except it's the most popular time control on the site. Now I will have to resort to 15 | 10, which is much, much longer and less popular which means I won't get games in my rating.

x-3232926362

There are plenty of faster time controls with increment: 2|1, 3|2, 5|5. If you play 10|0, 5|5 is not very different.

I personally prefer 15|10 to 10|0.

Edit: Ok, I do not know how difficult it is to find games with increment in high rating brackets.

x-3232926362

Besides, time controls without increment had been the norm until relatively recently. Was it all fake chess too?

SlantedLight

Besides, time controls without increment had been the norm until relatively recently. Was it all fake chess too?

Yes

 

You don't want to play at slower time controls, then you rage rant because you couldn't convert an easily won endgame in the time remaining.

Yes, that's exactly right. I lost because my opponent threw in 12 spite checks in a lost position.

x-3232926362
verylate wrote:

You don't want to play at slower time controls, then you rage rant because you couldn't convert an easily won endgame in the time remaining. <shrug>

Well, to be fair, he does not seem to be complaining about it being longer, but about it being less popular.

x-3232926362
SlantedLight wrote:

Besides, time controls without increment had been the norm until relatively recently. Was it all fake chess too?

Yes

So let me get it straight: you declare all chess played prior to 1990s-2000s fake chess?

By extension, Kasparov, who won his title in a match played with time control without increment, is, according to you, a fake world champion, then?

Duckfest
AntiMustard wrote:
SlantedLight wrote:

Besides, time controls without increment had been the norm until relatively recently. Was it all fake chess too?

Yes

So let me get it straight: you declare all chess played prior to 1990s-2000s fake chess?

Not only that, he declares chess without increment should be banned, even in casual games. Lol

SlantedLight

Yes, any ruleset that allows what happened in the game I posted is fake chess.

IMKeto

The level of whining and complaining is off the charts.

SlantedLight

Not only that, he declares chess without increment should be banned, even in casual games. Lol

That's right. Anyone who flags like that (except I suppose bullet/blitz games, which are just meant to be flag fests) should be banned from chess permanently. Not just from chess.com, but from ever touching a chess piece, or even talking about chess to anyone other than themself in their own head.

x-3232926362
SlantedLight wrote:

Yes, any ruleset that allows what happened in the game I posted is fake chess.

You do understand that this position of yours will mean only one thing: no-one is going to take you serious?

Immaculate_Slayer

YOU can't play it.

SlantedLight

And of course it bears little resemblance to real chess. Most people who play real chess do not play blitz. Except, perhaps, on here, where people are conditioned to think that blitz is also real chess.

You're exactly right. Also even worse, this was rapid, not blitz.

AunTheKnight

Here we go again...

 

I really would like a preset pool of 10|5 though.

SlantedLight
AunTheKnight wrote:

Here we go again...

 

I really would like a preset pool of 10|5 though.

 

I agree. They should make 10|5 and delete 10. Anyone who requests for 10 should have their account permanently banned.

x-3232926362
SlantedLight wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:

Here we go again...

 

I really would like a preset pool of 10|5 though.

 

I agree. They should make 10|5 and delete 10. Anyone who requests for 10 should have their account permanently banned.

You can rage on. Chess.com will not delete 10|0. Nor should it.

SlantedLight

You can rage on. Chess.com will not delete 10|0. Nor should it.

 

It should, because it is not true rapid. It is blitz, and allows fake chess to be played be people seeking real chess.

AunTheKnight
SlantedLight wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:

Here we go again...

 

I really would like a preset pool of 10|5 though.

 

I agree. They should make 10|5 and delete 10. Anyone who requests for 10 should have their account permanently banned.

No. Both 10|0 and 10|5 are good.