kaynight wrote:
zazen: Wait till the harridans on this site cop a look at your post.. Hee! Hee!
Gee beat up and still coming back for more, you must have some kind of masochistic tendencies.
Chess.com is not for women
Sort:
Register chesswomen.com and corner the market.
Howlin-Wolfmother wrote:
a free meal ticket out of their country to a better one.
lol
[COMMENT DELETED]
I am offended...
ATTACK!!!
Like this makes sense. Half of you people are doubtful of everyone else's gender & the other half don't care.
people should stop being so sensitive. Calling girls names is no different than some people insulting others when losing. No need to call out for a witch hunt whether his/her insult was racist/sexist/homophobic/etc. It's just an insult and probably out of anger. That's all. It's the internet after all
Agreed. zazen5 has an issue. 
zazen5 is just saying what we're all thinking.
erm....probably not. Least not 'all' of us anyway.
robbie_1969 wrote:
Care to explain this, Rob?
Jun 30, 2015
0
#335
I agree with the OP, women should be praised and empowered, there is a thread trying to accomplish the feat.
Come and be part of chess.com history
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/kayak21-or-batgirl
Jun 30, 2015
0
#336
stuzzicadenti wrote:
I don't like these feminist thoughts or things like international women's day, because there is no men's day or men's power movements, and it seems unfair.
Actually the neo-feminist movement is a man's idea purporting to be a women's one. Furthermore, the original feminist's movement and it's concomitant ideologies and beliefs are diametrically opposed to what we associate and define today as feminism.
Men don't need a day. They have the other 364 of the year. Women have a lot of influence in the free countries of the world every day if they know how to use it. In the not-free countries of the world, men fear the influence of women and so force them, or convince them, that they need to wear burkas and veils so that they do not tempt the males around them. Modesty, however, is a good thing to practice in any country, a fact which is often ignored in the fashion world of the U.S of A. What we need is a good infusion of common sense and mutual respect between races and sexes.
Jun 30, 2015
0
#338
blujay88 wrote:
What we need is a good infusion of common sense and mutual respect between races and sexes.
...and better fashion?
Jun 30, 2015
0
#339
batgirl wrote:
blujay88 wrote:
What we need is a good infusion of common sense and mutual respect between races and sexes.
...and better fashion?
fashion is a derivative of society, meaning fashion is highly influenced by it(society), thus if one hates fashion then unconsciously they have an aversion to society as a generality.
Tangentially, batgirl, do you agree with post 390.
Jun 30, 2015
0
#340
letsgohome wrote:
Tangentially, batgirl, do you agree with post 390.
I've never studied feminism and i'm pretty ignorant about the different camps. But in the US, as a movement, it seems to me to have its origins in the women's suffrage movement and the antidefranchisement activities of the likes of Elizabeth Stanton Cady and Susan B. Anthony. I don't think women want more, they just don't want to settle for less.
Most women I have to tolerate are really a waste of space, time, and money. Dead weight.
This is more a reflection of you than the people you are seeking to vilify.