Forums

Chess=Math?

Sort:
DMX21x1

I prefer 'Chess is life'.  I guess that would include mathematics but it covers all the bases. 

A mathematician should be good at Chess, not because of the maths, just because they should be smart enough to play the game. 

That applies to a lot of people though.  A street smart person should be able to play Chess just as well. 

HectorRaymundoFlores
87654321 wrote:

Yes Codebreaker_93 you may have a point, Emanuel Lasker arguably the all time greatest player is perhaps the most notable example of the connection.

>:)


Ironically, (being a mathematician) Lasker recognized Psychology as a critical aspect of the game.

At the end, mathematicians and computer scientist were able to design chess programs to beat the best humans (they were forced to understand the math-skeleton of chess to do it). But as you should agree, playing against a computer and against a human is a very different kind of game.

madhatter5

geometry,calculation,logic,intuition,surface area(owning more space), intelligence, nerdiness, memorization, pattern recognition, subtraction(how much more time does he have?), telling time(at 2:00 game and have that philly cheese steak in my fridge.), numbers, force, computers, arithmetic(4 minor pieces for a queen? not too bad!), creative thinking, algebra (how do I isolate the variable?), etc...

DonnieDarko1980

I'd guess (*guess*, not *know*, since I'm not a brain scientist) that the brain processes involved for calculating several moves ahead in chess and for mentally calculating with numbers are the same or at least similar. (I'm not very good in both :) Otherwise I don't see much that chess and math have in common ...

jaydeeuk1

I'd say it has more in common with computer programming.

I'm a sloppy programer, my methods can be inefficient, but I'm very good at thinking logically, and how each stage will come together before I've even declared a variable. Just like my chess, its not accurate, glaring errors, but seems to get the job done.

 

I suppose knowing more than one programming language is a bit like knowing more than one opening. The mid game is like programming the guts, and the end game is like debugging, do one bit poorly and you're stuffed.

LordChuckles

Being an mathematics student still in college, majoring in math education, I would say its more like chess teaches analytical skills that are used in not only math, but in other subjects as well, like the analysis of a story and its comcpts. In math, I would liken solving a proof in number theory to finding the right chess move, or sequence of moves, to play, because math like chess, one move implies another. All this being said, I'm not a chess student, but I will say, I have learned something from the game that i use in places other than the chess board. Bronstein said that chess is art, but to me math is my art, I can see its beauty, even if others can't, which is why i'm also an education major, I would love to be able to enlighten others to see what i see.