Could Magnus Carlsen Beat Computer-4-Impossible in bullet?

Sort:
chessredpanda

NO.

isauro2013
[COMMENT DELETED]
CP6033

easily, Compute-4-IMPOSSIBLE is strong against beginners like us but against the great Magnus Carlsen, there is no doubt. do you mean Every time they played, or have an even score or what.

penguingm1

of course

chessredpanda

match 10 games

bigbird419
Too easy for Magnus
bigbird419

Especially in bullet because Magnus owns in bullet

JohnnyKGB

He can´t,   but me yes. 

chessredpanda

how.Magnus is not that fast.is he?

chessredpanda

i am sure i am faster than him with premoves

steve_bute

I've won against Computer-4, and I suck in bullet. I can see Carlsen losing occasionally (when you make a mistake against even a mediocre engine, it notices, unlike a human opponent who might not see it), but on the whole he would dominate it.

Pre_VizsIa

Of course Carlsen would beat it.

TheGreatOogieBoogie

I think so because Magnus has loads of strategic patterns burnt into his DNA from intense study whereas the computer doesn't have enough time to properly calculate and eliminate bad moves.  So you have a modern day Capablanca with thousands of chunks, tactical and strategic against a machine that can only brute force, and doesn't have enough time for even that. 

DiogenesDue

Don't feed the troll.

chessredpanda

Gm lose to computer.were is the link to the game a stevebute

waffllemaster

Computer 4 impossible is not a full strength computer obviously, it would be rated about 800 points higher.  Probably playing around master level right now... although they don't play like humans of course.  Maybe as bad as 1500 player in a closed position and good as 2500 player in very tactical open position.

tliu1222

The computer moves faster and a bit more sensibly than any human. In my point of view I just move randomly lol but for Carlsen it's hard to tell.

waffllemaster
tliu1222 wrote:

The computer moves faster and a bit more sensibly than any human. In my point of view I just move randomly lol but for Carlsen it's hard to tell.

I literally can't imagine what a super GM can see in a position in just a few seconds.  For starters, their tactical shots in blitz are more complicated and better executed than what I might be able to find/do in a 2 hour game, same for their strategy.  The moves are not random.

macer75

As far as I know, the only bullet setting that u can play against the computers in live chess is 2/1, so I'll assume that that's what they're playing. I'd guess that in the long run, Carlsen would win 50% of the time, the computer 30%, and 20% of the time it would be a draw.

waffllemaster
chessredpanda wrote:

match of 10 games

Carlsen would win 9 or 10.