Could Magnus Carlsen Beat Computer-4-Impossible in bullet?

Sort:
Avatar of chessredpanda

NO.

Avatar of isauro2013
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of CP6033

easily, Compute-4-IMPOSSIBLE is strong against beginners like us but against the great Magnus Carlsen, there is no doubt. do you mean Every time they played, or have an even score or what.

Avatar of penguingm1

of course

Avatar of chessredpanda

match 10 games

Avatar of bigbird419
Too easy for Magnus
Avatar of bigbird419

Especially in bullet because Magnus owns in bullet

Avatar of JohnnyKGB

He can´t,   but me yes. 

Avatar of chessredpanda

how.Magnus is not that fast.is he?

Avatar of chessredpanda

i am sure i am faster than him with premoves

Avatar of steve_bute

I've won against Computer-4, and I suck in bullet. I can see Carlsen losing occasionally (when you make a mistake against even a mediocre engine, it notices, unlike a human opponent who might not see it), but on the whole he would dominate it.

Avatar of Pre_VizsIa

Of course Carlsen would beat it.

Avatar of TheGreatOogieBoogie

I think so because Magnus has loads of strategic patterns burnt into his DNA from intense study whereas the computer doesn't have enough time to properly calculate and eliminate bad moves.  So you have a modern day Capablanca with thousands of chunks, tactical and strategic against a machine that can only brute force, and doesn't have enough time for even that. 

Avatar of DiogenesDue

Don't feed the troll.

Avatar of chessredpanda

Gm lose to computer.were is the link to the game a stevebute

Avatar of waffllemaster

Computer 4 impossible is not a full strength computer obviously, it would be rated about 800 points higher.  Probably playing around master level right now... although they don't play like humans of course.  Maybe as bad as 1500 player in a closed position and good as 2500 player in very tactical open position.

Avatar of tliu1222

The computer moves faster and a bit more sensibly than any human. In my point of view I just move randomly lol but for Carlsen it's hard to tell.

Avatar of waffllemaster
tliu1222 wrote:

The computer moves faster and a bit more sensibly than any human. In my point of view I just move randomly lol but for Carlsen it's hard to tell.

I literally can't imagine what a super GM can see in a position in just a few seconds.  For starters, their tactical shots in blitz are more complicated and better executed than what I might be able to find/do in a 2 hour game, same for their strategy.  The moves are not random.

Avatar of macer75

As far as I know, the only bullet setting that u can play against the computers in live chess is 2/1, so I'll assume that that's what they're playing. I'd guess that in the long run, Carlsen would win 50% of the time, the computer 30%, and 20% of the time it would be a draw.

Avatar of waffllemaster
chessredpanda wrote:

match of 10 games

Carlsen would win 9 or 10.