Daeth Opining: The Future of Chess?

Sort:
EDB123
Chessman265 wrote:

Oh great spammers! I wish to be like you one day!

We aren't spammers. We're trolls. There's a difference... ...the name.

but

and I am still waiting for my challenge...

sabhijit

i, creator of the daeth opining group, will fight you to prove the soundness of the daeth opening.

EDB123

I feel like we have idiotic sequences here.

but

well, he really did challenge me...

macer75

O, but: I'm reluctant to challenge you only because you are rated much higher than me in correspondence. Because of our rating difference, I will probably still lose to you despite the superiority of the opining, but when other people look at the game they'll think that I lost because of the opining. So for that reason, sorry, I cannot challenge you.

but

oh ok, sabhijit challenged me anyways so you are off the hook

EDB123

Macer, your opening will quicken your demise. Just get some masters in to explain why this opening is terrible.

but

yea, well I am not playing Macer, I am playing sahijit and I think I am winning...or not...too early to tell

EDB123

post a link to it please. I will not comment.

EDB123

And this is the art of moronity right here.

but

yep

but

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=81197776

 

My conclusion of the opening, the pawn is just being annoying...that's it. I didn't move very well (bad day for me) but if I win, it just proves my point...

but

Hence why I am a 1300...but who are you to speak, you're a 1000...:)

sabhijit

im up a piece vs but

sabhijit

falcogrine

0-1

EDIT: MAJOR TYPO!!! I meant 1-0, my bad. Sorry :(

macer75
sabhijit wrote:
 

That's black to move right? It would be a totally lopsided win for white if it were white to move.

JMB2010

It's an ongoing game...

pujara123

i cant even find daeth