I said the existent of Aliens WOULDN'T invalidate origin theories. You read it as, the not following invalidates. Probably my comma threw you off.
In any case, there are no aliens. There's no proof of aliens, therefore, there are no aliens. You continue with the game. It's game over as far as I'm concerned.
My friend, no proof of something does not mean that it does not exist. Not too long ago everyone thought that the World was flat, no one knew that microbes existed, and the whole World thought that the Earth was the centre of the universe. After much time, proof was found to contradict the general thinking at the time. Because we have no proof now, does not mean that proof will not be found some day. Like I already argued, we do not know anything about 99% of the cosmos, so how can we make a definitive statement about something we know nothing about? I think that was check.
Rosenbalm wrote:
"Probably my comma threw you off."
----
I'm in a coma right now
They're gonna pick you up and send you back to Mexico!
I agree with you that the seeding of Earth is not a necessary function, but how does it invalidate evolution? And it certainly would not invalidate ALL origin theories. And for you to conclude that other life forms do not exist...without man even seeing 99% of the cosmos, clearly reveals your closed mind. Your arguements are full of holes. Please continue with the game.