Does Chess.com use Bots as Players on their live Games? - Chess Forums - Page 9

jrm05 · 2023-12-18T00:18:27-08:00

Im pretty sure they use bot as humans players. im a normal 1400 player and i played everyday. I am now 1100. Not because im too weak, i sometimes played 91% accuracy and the lowest was 59 or less on my worst. On my best at 1100 player, i battle with someone who is 88- 90% accurate most of the times

AveryHyena

Dec 15, 2025

0

#161

Bsagraves wrote:

"Additionally, I don't "only play against bots", as you can see from my profile. My last five games that are displayed are four real games and one bot game. " I hope you get some help truly this is beyond adorable slightly reaching sad. also being that you likely created that account because you have others that are low Elo also likely speaks for itself hence why the whole 29 days burner thing was brought up but yea i hope this account works this time for you.
what is really wild you could have played 4 games vs people in that time and proved wrong but cant sacrifce this accounts Elo you are paying for it after all.

And what exactly about that statement is a lie? I said I don't only play against bots, and hey would you look at that, I don't only play against bots. Wow, what a "lie".

Anyway, I won't debate my profile activity with you for a fifth time, since you only see what you want to see.

You say I "can't sacrifice this account's Elo" because I'm afraid of losing. This is the core of your problem. You view playing chess as 'risking' rating, while people who actually improve view it as learning. You can't get better if you're paralyzed by the fear of seeing a lower number on your screen.

Your accusation that I have low-Elo "other accounts" or that I'm trying to make an account "work this time" just reveals your own mindset. You are projecting. If you haven't already done it, it's obvious that you've thought about it before. I think that "speaks for itself".

The fact that Grandmasters create new accounts and are able to speedrun to 2500 rating and beyond, rarely losing a single game, completely shatters your theory that the site is rigged for a 50/50 winrate or is luck based or whatever conspiracy theory you believe in.

I’m going to continue with the lessons you think are such a waste of time. See you in a few months.
Good luck with the "bots".

Bsagraves

Dec 15, 2025

0

#162

AveryHyena wrote:

Bsagraves wrote:

"Additionally, I don't "only play against bots", as you can see from my profile. My last five games that are displayed are four real games and one bot game. " I hope you get some help truly this is beyond adorable slightly reaching sad. also being that you likely created that account because you have others that are low Elo also likely speaks for itself hence why the whole 29 days burner thing was brought up but yea i hope this account works this time for you.
what is really wild you could have played 4 games vs people in that time and proved wrong but cant sacrifce this accounts Elo you are paying for it after all.

And what exactly about that statement is a lie? I said I don't only play against bots, and hey would you look at that, I don't only play against bots. Wow, what a "lie".

Anyway, I won't debate my profile activity with you for a fifth time, since you only see what you want to see.

You say I "can't sacrifice this account's Elo" because I'm afraid of losing. This is the core of your problem. You view playing chess as 'risking' rating, while people who actually improve view it as learning. You can't get better if you're paralyzed by the fear of seeing a lower number on your screen.

Your accusation that I have low-Elo "other accounts" or that I'm trying to make an account "work this time" just reveals your own mindset. You are projecting. If you haven't already done it, it's obvious that you've thought about it before. I think that "speaks for itself".

The fact that Grandmasters create new accounts and are able to speedrun to 2500 rating and beyond, rarely losing a single game, completely shatters your theory that the site is rigged for a 50/50 winrate or is luck based or whatever conspiracy theory you believe in.

I’m going to continue with the lessons you think are such a waste of time. See you in a few months.
Good luck with the "bots".

i have yet to say lessons or learning is a waste of time but you do like to project
" just reveals your own mindset" of what? This is my one and only profile That was a lot of nonsense to cry about me calling bots a Possibility and mods trash but hey cope harder if i just paid a year sub after only playing bots and 1 real player on a gambling site id be bent to but nope i just come here to play a few and leave i learn when i can and want to but its not my life you are right my Elo is low because of that but i assure you my Elo isnt my life its a game gambling when its comes to this place. also said nothing of this theory you claim i do hope you get some help with that, conspircy reaching and putting words into my mouth is for sure not being as sad as you make it. okay.
"completely shatters your theory that the site is rigged for a 50/50 winrate or is luck based or whatever conspiracy theory you believe in."
Either Reading is hard for you or you just rant either way way to prove all my points. Because i said Mods are garbage and There are likely a ton of bots and burners as well as trolls and cheaters thats common sense

CoachRonald

Dec 16, 2025

0

#163

Can I get a burner account too, I might need it to pass my ratings on this one

overbehind

Dec 16, 2025

0

#164

Using an account created on november the 17th with LITERALLY 0 games played against real humans to defend yourself is a testiment on how clueless chess com is. People have woken up to your ways and the way you defend yourself is logging onto an account that literally looks like a bot. Come on chess com your downfall is inevitable.

chesssblackbelt

Dec 16, 2025

0

#165

Are you actually from Seychelles? I like the flag

AlfalfaBul

Dec 17, 2025

0

#166

AveryHyena wrote:

Reading this forum was hilarious. A bunch of conspiracy theorists with skill issues who want to blame elo hell for their inability to climb, but they can't because elo hell doesn't exist in a 1v1 game like chess, so they grasp at straws and blame the secret bot illuminati instead 😂

This is why I also love speedcubing because there is literally nothing to blame. No opponents to blame, no secret bots to blame, no teammates to blame, no cheating to blame. They are forced to deal with their own inadequacy.

#14 is hilarious too. "By the way, if you win 4-5 games in a row, expect a sudden 100% accuracy bot after that. You are certainly gonna lose 5-6 games". Lil bro wins a lot, is surprised that opponents are now more skilled, gets tilted after one loss and goes on a losing streak, blames "bots".

You are obviously the newest bot posting as a human on this forum.

It is really dumb though.

After my rating plummet of I am now playing at a rating about one third my actual rating. The bots are still beating me though, ever second game. The problem is the actual human players who have the skill of that level. They play the bots, and then when they play humans, they play me and players like me, how wipe the board with them.

I assume bots aren't paying members on this site, and if humans never enjoy it, they won't decide to become members either.

Now I have been told that the naughty kids like me, who swear at the bots and the cocky posters, and resign games we already won just for the hell of it, and wait for time to run out when a bot plays a GM game at 600 rating, just to keep it occupied for longer so it can't rob another human of rating points... have the naughty division where we play each other and bots. And the good kids who hands this cite the Vaseline to screw them from behind have a different devision where they play eachother and nice bots... 🤣

If that is so, then maybe you coddled kids should come play us mean kids, we learn from nasty bots. We have skills!!

Marcus_Wolters

30 days ago

0

#167

I don´t want to play bots without asking me. If i want i use. I payed for it. What is the actual goal, it is becoming not reputable!

!

overbehind

30 days ago

0

#168

chesssblackbelt wrote:

Are you actually from Seychelles? I like the flag

Nah i just like the flag too lol

wester7

9 days ago

0

#169

Martin_Stahl a écrit :

HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

Yeah, this Martin_Stahl guy exhibits some AI behavior, definitely not human.

I'm absolutely human.

all bots say that.

EmmA_hello

9 days ago

0

#170

ahhhhhhhhhhhhh so many words

EmmA_hello

9 days ago

0

#171

also wester7 I agree with you

the_craven

9 days ago

0

#172

Well they do use bots and you weren’t supposed to find out but now you have and they are coming to kill you as I type this. Get out of the house. NOW!!!

trapazoidvoid

9 days ago

0

#173

I’m a bot and chess.com pays me to play live games

OperationalPrudence

1 day ago

0

#174

trapazoidvoid wrote:

I’m a bot and chess.com pays me to play live games

I don’t believe that

TheDifferenceOfTier5

1 day ago

0

#175

warsoaps wrote:

I encountered a guy not too long ago who only played his queen. I looked through his games and in pretty much all of them he was doing the same. Not only that, virtually every game i've played as black, I've had to use the alekhine defence because they all play the same opening.

you realize you're talking about 1.e4, the move played in almost 50% of games