Don't want 960

Sort:
ppera011

Could I somehow disable all 960 related messages and links. That is not a chess but a disgrace of a game for me and I do not want to be bothered with the messages and content related to that nonsense.

Also this site should stop supporting that, IMO. If not please add option to completely disable any link or notion of 960.

furtiveking

Completely blocking out any references to Chess960 is impossible, at least doing so in a way that makes sense is. Also, the site isn't likely to stop offering it to those who want to play it. If you don't want to play it, you don't have to. Just don't accept any games, or start in any tournaments that feature it, and you won't ever have to play it. Most of the games on this site are NOT 960 anyway.

Svetamodieifed
rich wrote:

I was wondering this too just couldn't be bothered with posting it. I also think chess960 is nonsense.


+1

 

I think theyneed to add a opion for turning it off.  Would help.

tryst

I don't think taking away the option of playing 960 would be right, but, I agree that Chess960 is a disgrace. An arrogant statement by some jerk who couldn't defend his title and insulted the game of chess by announcing it was dull. It's Fischer's crybaby legacy.

staggerlee

What ridiculous statements from all of you.  How can you be so offended just by the existence of a fun chess variant?  If you don't like it, don't play it.  If you're offended by its existence, get your head checked.

tryst
staggerlee wrote:

What ridiculous statements from all of you.  How can you be so offended just by the existence of a fun chess variant?  If you don't like it, don't play it.  If you're offended by its existence, get your head checked.


If you don't like people having dissenting opinions on 960, don't read it. If you're offended by the existence of dissent, get your head checked.

Mainline_Novelty

it gets confusing trying to play 960 and regular at the same time.

Tricklev
tryst wrote:
staggerlee wrote:

What ridiculous statements from all of you.  How can you be so offended just by the existence of a fun chess variant?  If you don't like it, don't play it.  If you're offended by its existence, get your head checked.


If you don't like people having dissenting opinions on 960, don't read it. If you're offended by the existence of dissent, get your head checked.


If you don´t like people having dissenting opinions about people having dissenting opinions on 960, don't read it. If you're offended by the existance of dissent, get your head checked.

 

Let's not be childish tryst, staggerlee makes a good point.

smileative

With you on that staggerlee - it's a bit of fun and makes a nice change from time to time - bloody good tactics and strategy practise too. Anyone getting offended by the existence of a game needs a serious reality check Laughing

CerebralAssassin
staggerlee wrote:

What ridiculous statements from all of you.  How can you be so offended just by the existence of a fun chess variant?  If you don't like it, don't play it.  If you're offended by its existence, get your head checked.


agreed.

tryst
Tricklev wrote:
tryst wrote:
staggerlee wrote:

What ridiculous statements from all of you.  How can you be so offended just by the existence of a fun chess variant?  If you don't like it, don't play it.  If you're offended by its existence, get your head checked.


If you don't like people having dissenting opinions on 960, don't read it. If you're offended by the existence of dissent, get your head checked.


If you don´t like people having dissenting opinions about people having dissenting opinions on 960, don't read it. If you're offended by the existance of dissent, get your head checked.

 

Let's not be childish tryst, staggerlee makes a good point.


Your post was childish. And if he made a good point it's invisible to me.

nuclearturkey
AnthonyCG wrote:

The ONLY difference is that theory is removed.

Draw your own conclusions.


Not the only difference at all.

Atos

Actually I would like to see Chess 960 in Live Chess too. I think that it is a good idea regardless of who invented it and why.

ppera011

To me it is ridiculous. It is not a "chess variant" as someone said and difference is not just a "removed theory".

It is just stupid and waste of time to me. A failed mock attempt of a real chess. It should not be promoted and encouraged because it hurts real chess IMO.

I don't like it and don't want to be bothered with messages and invitations about it.

nuclearturkey
AnthonyCG wrote:

What else?


I've never played it, but it's quite obvious that apart from opening theory going out of the window the games will take on an entirely different nature to regular chess.

trigs

is there anyway to just block all posts and threads and any other content on this site that i find annoying and whiny? i mean to include all threads where people complain about additional content on this site that the site owners were gracious enough to add for everyone who is interested in using it.

no there isn't a way? guess i'll just have to try to ignore threads like this one in the future.

Atos
nuclearturkey wrote:
AnthonyCG wrote:

What else?


I've never played it, but it's quite obvious that apart from opening theory going out of the window the games will take on an entirely different nature to regular chess.


Hm... maybe try playing a few games. I think you might find that it is more similar to normal chess than it looks at first.

trigs
Atos wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
AnthonyCG wrote:

What else?


I've never played it, but it's quite obvious that apart from opening theory going out of the window the games will take on an entirely different nature to regular chess.


Hm... maybe try playing a few games. I think you might find that it is more similar to normal chess than it looks at first.


openings are obviously different. some to most middle games are different. endgames are pretty much the same imho.

mkrysz
[COMMENT DELETED]
mkrysz
tryst wrote:

I don't think taking away the option of playing 960 would be right, but, I agree that Chess960 is a disgrace. An arrogant statement by some jerk who couldn't defend his title and insulted the game of chess by announcing it was dull. It's Fischer's crybaby legacy.


Actually Chess960 or something similar was Capablanca's idea. And it's supported by some top GMs - check out these quotes http://www.chess960.net/quotes

I think it's a great game, far more creative than chess. Fischer was right saying that it's a game of skill, not memorization.

This forum topic has been locked