But chess is fun because I win over my opponent in brainpower, not in luck
gambling and chess variation
That would be interesting . . . But I feel like the gambling aspect would take precedence over the actual chess, because the entire game would be based on who can make 3 moves in a row. whoever ran out of chips first would lose, but at the same time, threats of checkmate would also make someone waste all his chips
here is an idea for playing standard chess but with a financial element that would, i hope, provide some interesting games regardless of the possibility that people may choose to "cheat" by employing chess software etc...
as in poker games, both players "buy-in" for a set amount, for example, one dollar each. they each recieve 2000 "chips". at the beginning of each turn, both players bid (secretly) for the right to move a piece. bids are then declared and highest bid wins. highest bid now moves a piece. once the piece has been moved, a new turn begins and once again players bid to move a piece. it is possible for a player to win a succession of bids and so make a succession of moves while his opponent makes none.
the only exception to this is "check". if a player is put in check he must and can move. but having moved (out of check), a new turn begins and players bid etc...
when a player runs out of chips he cannot move again until his opponent also runs out of chips, at which point moves proceed as in a normal game.
the winner makes back his dollar and gets 95c from his opponent. the site keeps the other 5c.