jmotoyam wrote:
He is not bad. He is the one that created the world. Okay? I'm so frustrated.
In a perfect world there would be no trysts' and bjazzes
God
Sort:
bjazz wrote:
BirdBrain wrote:
Jmotoyam, I will send you a private message - anytime you post public forums about God, they can lock the forum - you have to discuss God in alternate fashions :-) I wouldn't waste your time in a public forum.
I wouldn't waste my time with god.
[Whoa... I just found a flaming hater inside of me. Sweet]
bjazz wrote:
jmotoyam wrote:
He is not bad. He is the one that created the world. Okay? I'm so frustratate
In a perfect world there would be no trysts' and bjazzes
That's you!!!!!!!!!
Quoting bible: useless
Quoting bjazz: priceless
The "one" in the bible? Re-read it and becareful about loose translations. There are lot of gods in the bible. The first word for the god of the bible (which is not the only god in the bible if you take that collection of books' word for it) is plural and they say "we". But I want to hear more about Aphrodite's nighty.
what does this topic have to do with chess?
Jmotoyam, I won't respond again after this - two things I learned the hard way.
#1 - You are TOTALLY wasting your time by posting in a public forum. I see you have done this once before, and they locked that one and asked you politely to refrain. There are better ways to discuss God than to do it this way, even on chess.com.
#2 - If you are trying to discuss God on chess.com and win some people over to God, you are not going to do it by breaking the rules like this. Why not simply join a group where people are interested in discussing God (and where it is allowed) rather than risking the moderators to block you in the forums for continued lack of care for the rules? They warned you once on this, and you are coming back for more.
I personally post in blog format (this is permitted by chess.com rules), and I post in groups that cater to religion. Here, you are simply getting trashed, because not only do certain people believe in God, but they know that you are breaking the rules here. You will be more respected if you use the tools chess.com has provided you for religious discussion and learning.
After this post, I am signing off this forum - I sincerly hope you consider the advice :-)
Aphrodite's nighty was rather flighty; it fell spritely nightly, we all looked on brightly.
theoreticalboy wrote:
jmotoyam wrote:
He is not bad. He is the one that created the world. Okay? I'm so frustrated.
Ohhhh, you mean the giant omnipotent turtle? Yeah, that dude's pretty cool.
I thought the world was created by wolverine shit?
I think some of us need to know who to pray to when we play that third move of the game hoping to get a check mate on the next move. I know I do.
bigpoison wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
jmotoyam wrote:
He is not bad. He is the one that created the world. Okay? I'm so frustrated.
Ohhhh, you mean the giant omnipotent turtle? Yeah, that dude's pretty cool.
I thought the world was created by wolverine shit?
You're sooooooooooooo Midwest.
chessoholicalien wrote:
what does this topic have to do with chess?
Lol good question.
I suppose that many chess players are interested in various conspiracy theories and are sometimes prone to delusions.
And when you venture into discussing delusions, what grander delusion is there than the:
Grandest Ontological Delusion.
bigpoison wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
jmotoyam wrote:
He is not bad. He is the one that created the world. Okay? I'm so frustrated.
Ohhhh, you mean the giant omnipotent turtle? Yeah, that dude's pretty cool.
I thought the world was created by wolverine shit?
Does that make Stan Lee or Jack Kirby the "God above God"?
theoreticalboy wrote:
bigpoison wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
jmotoyam wrote:
He is not bad. He is the one that created the world. Okay? I'm so frustrated.
Ohhhh, you mean the giant omnipotent turtle? Yeah, that dude's pretty cool.
I thought the world was created by wolverine shit?
You're sooooooooooooo Midwest.
Chicago sucks!
BirdBrain wrote:
Jmotoyam, I won't respond again after this - two things I learned the hard way.
#1 - You are TOTALLY wasting your time by posting in a public forum. I see you have done this once before, and they locked that one and asked you politely to refrain. There are better ways to discuss God than to do it this way, even on chess.com.
#2 - If you are trying to discuss God on chess.com and win some people over to God, you are not going to do it by breaking the rules like this. Why not simply join a group where people are interested in discussing God (and where it is allowed) rather than risking the moderators to block you in the forums for continued lack of care for the rules? They warned you once on this, and you are coming back for more.
I personally post in blog format (this is permitted by chess.com rules), and I post in groups that cater to religion. Here, you are simply getting trashed, because not only do certain people believe in God, but they know that you are breaking the rules here. You will be more respected if you use the tools chess.com has provided you for religious discussion and learning.
After this post, I am signing off this forum - I sincerly hope you consider the advice :-)
+1
No where's 'em flames...?
bigpoison wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
bigpoison wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
jmotoyam wrote:
He is not bad. He is the one that created the world. Okay? I'm so frustrated.
Ohhhh, you mean the giant omnipotent turtle? Yeah, that dude's pretty cool.
I thought the world was created by wolverine shit?
You're sooooooooooooo Midwest.
Chicago sucks!
Correction: it blows. Though my poetry about it is outstanding, obviously.
Ohhhh, you mean the giant omnipotent turtle? Yeah, that dude's pretty cool.