I just hate the idea of forcing people to do things they might do not like, most people do not like V3 so why V3? why not to fix the V2 Disadvantages ???
Good bye chess.com
Sort:
Aug 31, 2017
0
#22
Aug 31, 2017
0
#23
Anyone know the reasoning behind the change? I don't mean the supposed 98% of users are using V3. I mean why the change period?
Aug 31, 2017
0
#24
I'm 68 and made the switch many, may months ago; perhaps a year. I'm on a laptop and MUCH prefer V3
Aug 31, 2017
0
#25
Things that don't change, stand still and are left in the wake of others. Progress means change so just use it and become accustomed to it.
Eseles summed it up so well when he said, "
#2115 min ago
I wish you stay in v3 and help the developers make it better by showing them what problems it has - and possibly how they can fix them.
".
Aug 31, 2017
0
#26
@President_Max will do sir!! Don't forget to remind me, though - memory's no longer what it used to be...
(joke)
Aug 31, 2017
0
#27
making a new platform is much easier than fixing the old one??? this is so very funny.
My iPad does not work with v3.................shitty v3
Aug 31, 2017
0
#29
Admittedly, I also didn't like v3 at all! However, I decided months ago that I'd force myself to use it because I knew the day would come when I had no choice and wanted to give myself time to get used to it. Honestly, I don't even give it a second thought now. Change is inevitable...we either go with it or get left behind.
I didn't know that you could change it to 'classic' until a poster mentioned it, I will check that out!
Thanks for being a friend Storm....Good luck and all the best!
Aug 31, 2017
0
#30
solskytz wrote:
V2 is better - but because it's better, not for any other reason. It's simply faster when you play blitz.
Apart from that (the speed in blitz) I believe that V3 is actually better.
But I like blitz so much, that the balance is still on the side of V2.
I'd look at your equipment, friend, because I have no lag issues at all. I found no difference between the two.
My last comment on the matter. Que sera will be!
Aug 31, 2017
0
#31
V3 is not an inprovement on V2 but the opposite . Dont believe 98 % are using V3. Simply not true. Many people will leave when V2 is finally closed. Chess.com inflicting self harm on itself. ..
Aug 31, 2017
0
#32
The_Storm_555 wrote:
I just hate the idea of forcing people to do things they might do not like, most people do not like V3 so why V3? why not to fix the V2 Disadvantages ???
It's easier
Aug 31, 2017
0
#33
"(8%' are using it doesn't mean, "Exclusively". I'm sure many switch to and fro for whatever their needs are. (Now. Where's the, "Unfollow" button?
Probably will need a new computer to play chess......no longer free
They have kept v.2 open as long as possible, and can now make improvements to v.3, just let them know what improvements you would like & be constructive 
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScLKBenaRZ_IMy_8Od6REzfZT-lAUcd1h12AnWG26bQ9sY60A/viewform
Aug 31, 2017
0
#36
<Karnakatz> it can't be my equipment, because I also play on another site (most of the time actually) and its hyper fast - as it should be!
Aug 31, 2017
0
#38
The_Storm_555 wrote:
Good bye chess.com the site I know for more than 19 years...
...
I have been here in chess.com V2 since it was www.chesspark.com ...
Chess.com started in 2007 and never was Chesspark. I believe erik acquired the members of that site, sometime after I started here, but I would need to look for the specifics.
Aug 31, 2017
0
#39
The_Storm_555 wrote:
I just hate the idea of forcing people to do things they might do not like, most people do not like V3 so why V3? why not to fix the V2 Disadvantages ???
The site has some backend updates to make that can not be made while v2 is around. Well, they probably could but it would be the same since much of the code will break after.
Brendan_UK wrote:
They have kept v.2 open as long as possible, and can now make improvements to v.3, just let them know what improvements you would like & be constructive
They have kept it open for longer than I thought they would. My suggestion for making version 3 better is to implement all the features of version two, while eliminating all the features of version 3. I dont think they will do that though. I'll still use it, but not as much. I agree with many other people, at that point there are just too many other good options with other sites.
Who is this under my knife?