Has anyone ever in an actual chess game promoted to a minor piece

Sort:
kiwifresa
There are certain positions where it is ideal, either to avoid a draw or for checkmate, but I can't remember ever doing it! Just wondering. *doing it to play with your opponent doesn't count X/
ArubanRefugee

Yes, I've chosen a knight more than once to put opponents in check

LM_player

I had a bishop and a pawn. and i decided to promote my pawn to a bishop. (to checkmate with 2 bishops).

Then i realized that both of my bishops were on the dark squares.

RIP- my game...

MayCaesar

I promoted to a knight, at least, twice for checks in a position I desperately need them. Aside from that, I've promoted to rooks instead of queens many times, but that was just being fancy with no real necessity.

RookSacrifice_OLD

Some kids don't resign and play to checkmate. Quite often, when they lose, their opponents promote to a lot of bishops and knights to be funny.

ArubanRefugee

How s that funny? 

universityofpawns

There are positions where it is checkmate with a knight promotion but not a queen.....

 

universityofpawns

oopppsss:

 

universityofpawns

 

tomiki

In an end game a promoted rook is far better than a queen, less chance of a stalemate.  A knight when warranted, a bishop rarely.

universityofpawns

and smothered mate

 

SmyslovFan

In simuls, when I get the chance, I promote to a B+N ending at least once to show my students how to perform the mate. 

Gunrunner2

LM_player that was funny!

universityofpawns

yeah, bishop and knight is the toughest one....have to Sheppard the King to the side of the board....I had to take a few draws on that one due to time....takes like 15+ moves or so if the other guy knows what he is is doing and starts with King in center....

Eseles

ponz111

i have  twice and both times it was with very good reason. Here is one of the times:

Opening Ponziani  time limit `15 minutes per side.